From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE70E426D05; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 14:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775052581; cv=none; b=d+frCyBTIE6md/cElHGEH7l/88a7YiNPDUgvKKI2kk4lfhPPl4X2t+btsSxgS0AAwxCzdPmtT5Upcez0/0X3j5/vgYx/q3EvheuDxPtk1WVYeirw/VsxegJJ9bKAhqQ+WCiqFsS0eCvKILya54m2bDJDNkD3b12oEpc6N+w9rT8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775052581; c=relaxed/simple; bh=47tRIZNI9xSR1J9LQxup3Dqu0F5P36sAvy+kn9+1MSE=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=B4q8MN6iaFMDr8rOzv5pZI10AcUVItIbi9gcpliKY2TyShb4VXfpkyoVPixU6P10Zs0oj7jclsLyl/6JJM2y3trSdrB04zNIl8+kJ9RUDYdAjDcNYF+kBC8IlTxVOtXJNXyH2SbhWgVZUrypBk1qEiN0m+MkPOldIivs+sOTs1o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b=M5NwA0wv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="M5NwA0wv" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22AD26476; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 16:09:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id NF_4uX9QEzl9; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 16:09:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1775052576; bh=47tRIZNI9xSR1J9LQxup3Dqu0F5P36sAvy+kn9+1MSE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=M5NwA0wvai1iNFa9U/dwK8coQmdrAjpyDupLIIj5kkIkTl3zPRoYegtLSeFKGEDKf 5MeIFbD9I/ub22qyvtWEQslt8igP8gT+jlFUj2P2RwvhV++J6HTzKAMoHno3f9XlW6 WRT+3s0oB4W1JfXgHKYlHmkb39Oldr4dhFIdafL9nRzB2JvLpu+MaVMGlwTz8a2Kr8 Qv4t/mFCNft8/Uzw6m/HgucbS9KO2K5dNvT6sJFL2zDTYrOEWE/KDtjKgQC+t0Kbaf QPFOzQUiA7me3cSbeU9SLSJXuMbjGW3rHANtFr0eO6sVemB3NPmm7x+SJ4d/IYQkEH eu5SI7kYGMvpQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 14:09:35 +0000 From: Rustam Adilov To: Andi Shyti Cc: Chris Packham , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] i2c: rtl9300: support for RTL9607C I2C controller In-Reply-To: References: <20260326152656.14030-1-adilov@disroot.org> Message-ID: <049adbc3ec3b15229684bf26c167f1a3@disroot.org> X-Sender: adilov@disroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Andi, On 2026-03-31 22:38, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Rustam, > >> Rustam Adilov (8): >> i2c: rtl9300: split data_reg into read and write reg >> i2c: rtl9300: introduce max length property to driver data >> i2c: rtl9300: introduce F_BUSY to the reg_fields struct >> i2c: rtl9300: introduce a property for 8 bit width reg address >> dt-bindings: i2c: realtek,rtl9301-i2c: extend for clocks and >> RTL9607C >> support >> i2c: rtl9300: introduce clk struct for upcoming rtl9607 support >> i2c: rtl9300: intoduce new function properties to driver data > > Patch 7 does not apply (not even in i2c-host-next, next, > mainline). Which branch are you on? Can you please > rebase on top of i2c/i2c-host, please? > > Thanks, > Andi > >> i2c: rtl9300: add RTL9607C i2c controller support As per the request of Chris Packham [1] this whole patch sets depends on [2] to be applied first before my patches. I don't know if you have seen it yet cause Jan Kantert didn't include you in the emails to the send the patch to. Although, i just now have noticed patch 7 has a typo in its commit subject which i have to fix. [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/c933a245-2b35-41a5-9eee-cb655c8231ae@alliedtelesis.co.nz/ [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260227111134.2163701-1-jan-kernel@kantert.net/ Best, Rustam