From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
computersforpeace@gmail.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, mturquette@baylibre.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, dev@lynxeye.de, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
richard@nod.at, marcel@ziswiler.com, krzk@kernel.org,
benjamin.lindqvist@endian.se, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
pgaikwad@nvidia.com, mirza.krak@gmail.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: tegra20: init NDFLASH clock to sensible rate
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 15:19:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04cdfdf5-33c5-b569-9cd7-dda1b9ea0baf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90180dd9fc6e60175c54b9d70e50f0e5@agner.ch>
On 29.05.2018 15:12, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 29.05.2018 09:48, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:53:08PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>> On 28.05.2018 09:55, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>>> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:54:40PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>>>> From: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
>>>>>
>>>>> Set up the NAND Flash controller clock to run at 150MHz
>>>>> instead of the rate set by the bootloader. This is a
>>>>> conservative rate which also yields good performance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 1 +
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
>>>>> index 0ee56dd04cec..dff8c425cd28 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
>>>>> @@ -1049,6 +1049,7 @@ static struct tegra_clk_init_table init_table[] __initdata = {
>>>>> { TEGRA20_CLK_GR2D, TEGRA20_CLK_PLL_C, 300000000, 0 },
>>>>> { TEGRA20_CLK_GR3D, TEGRA20_CLK_PLL_C, 300000000, 0 },
>>>>> { TEGRA20_CLK_VDE, TEGRA20_CLK_CLK_MAX, 300000000, 0 },
>>>>> + { TEGRA20_CLK_NDFLASH, TEGRA20_CLK_PLL_P, 150000000, 0 },
>>>>> /* must be the last entry */
>>>>> { TEGRA20_CLK_CLK_MAX, TEGRA20_CLK_CLK_MAX, 0, 0 },
>>>>> };
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.17.0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe better to specify this in the Tegra20 dtsi? See
>>>> "Assigned clock parents and rates" in
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
>>>
>>> assigned-clocks indeed works just fine for this case. Thanks for
>>> bringing this up, will drop this patch and add the device tree
>>> properties in v3.
>>>
>>> Hm, interesting that none of the Tegra device tree make use of the
>>> feature so far. I guess there would be other cases where this would be
>>> useful as well (the one just above, VDE?).
>>>
>>
>> Yes, historically this feature wasn't available, so we used these init tables.
>> Unfortunately it's not easy to get rid of them for parent and rate
>> configuration, because new kernels should also work with existing DTBs, so we
>> can't just add assigned-clock properties and remove the existing table
>> entries. What we could do is use the CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for all clocks which
>> are only enabled by the init table. For not yet merged blocks, this is
>> ofcourse not a concern.
>
> Sure I understand.
>
> Was just somewhat surprised that it isn't used at all yet (grep -r -e
> assigned-clock arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra* returns nothing). After all,
> assigned clocks bindings have been merged in 2014 :-)
>
> At least "clk: tegra: Specify VDE clock rate" merged earlier this year
> would have been a candidate already.
I wasn't even aware of existence of the assigned-clock properties, probably just
like others.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-29 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-27 21:54 [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: tegra20: init NDFLASH clock to sensible rate Stefan Agner
2018-05-28 7:55 ` Peter De Schrijver
2018-05-28 15:53 ` Stefan Agner
2018-05-28 15:58 ` Lucas Stach
2018-05-29 7:48 ` Peter De Schrijver
2018-05-29 12:12 ` Stefan Agner
2018-05-29 12:19 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2018-05-30 7:42 ` Peter De Schrijver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04cdfdf5-33c5-b569-9cd7-dda1b9ea0baf@gmail.com \
--to=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.lindqvist@endian.se \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@lynxeye.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@ziswiler.com \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mirza.krak@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=pgaikwad@nvidia.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).