From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>,
agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
quic_plai@quicinc.com, bgoswami@codeaurora.org, perex@perex.cz,
tiwai@suse.com, rohitkr@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
swboyd@chromium.org, judyhsiao@chromium.org,
yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com
Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: remove redundant wait for completion
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:43:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06650d56-eed3-73ad-d6b4-6b56a5a70669@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a99a59eb-cd59-f566-b98d-486c94f32eec@linaro.org>
On 2/25/22 08:45, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 25/02/2022 14:44, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>> Remove wait_for_completion_timeout from soundwire probe as it seems
>> unnecessary and device enumeration is anyway not happening here,
>> hence this api is blocking till it completes max wait time.
>> Also, as device enumeration event is dependent on wcd938x probe to be
>> completed, its of no use waiting here.
>> Waiting here increasing the boot time almost 4 seconds and impacting
>> other modules like touch screen.
>>
>> Fixes: 06dd96738d618 ("soundwire: qcom: wait for enumeration to be
>> complete in probe")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@quicinc.com>
>
> LGTM,
>
> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
I don't get the idea, sorry.
If you look at the code, these are the cases where this 'struct
completion' is used
struct completion enumeration;
complete(&ctrl->enumeration);
/* Enable Auto enumeration */
init_completion(&ctrl->enumeration);
wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->enumeration,
so if you remove the wait_for_completeion, then you might just as well
remove the whole thing and revert 06dd96738d618
what am I missing?
>> ---
>> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> index 5481341..9a32a24 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> @@ -1309,8 +1309,6 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> qcom_swrm_init(ctrl);
>> - wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctrl->enumeration,
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>> ret = qcom_swrm_register_dais(ctrl);
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_master_add;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-25 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 14:44 [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: remove redundant wait for completion Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
2022-02-25 14:45 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-02-25 15:43 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-02-25 18:03 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-02-26 12:49 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
2022-02-26 12:47 ` Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06650d56-eed3-73ad-d6b4-6b56a5a70669@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bgoswami@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=judyhsiao@chromium.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=quic_plai@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_potturu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_srivasam@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rohitkr@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).