From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>,
tiwai@suse.com, broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz
Cc: jonathanh@nvidia.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Mohan Kumar <mkumard@nvidia.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ALSA: hda/tegra: Skip reset on BPMP devices
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:56:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0761f6f2-27f8-4e1a-fabc-9d319f465a9e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48f891bc-d8f6-2634-6dd1-6ea4f14ae6a3@nvidia.com>
14.12.2021 10:22, Sameer Pujar пишет:
...
>>> How the reset behavior is different? At this point when HDA driver is
>>> loaded the HW is already reset during display ungate. What matters,
>>> during HDA driver load, is whether the HW is in predictable state or not
>>> and the answer is yes. So I am not sure what problem you are referring
>>> to. Question is, if BPMP already ensures this, then why driver needs to
>>> take care of it.
>> 1. Enable display
>> 2. Play audio over HDMI
>
>> 3. HDA hardware now is in dirty state
>
> Why this would be a dirty state? It is rather a functional state. Isn't
> it? Power-domain is ON while all this happens.
In general state should be a functional, but we shouldn't assume that.
There is always a possibility for a subtle bug in a driver that may put
h/w into a bad state. Full hardware reset is encouraged by users.
> Another point is, with present logic the reset is not applied for every
> runtime PM resume of HDA device, which is confusing. It depends on the
> state of 'chip->running' flag and I don't see this getting cleared
> anywhere. Would you say subsequent HDA playback happen under a dirty state?
This is a good point. There should be another potential problem in the
HDA driver for newer SoCs because apparently we don't re-initialize HDA
controller properly after runtime PM resume.
See hda_tegra_first_init() that is invoked only during driver probe, it
configures FPCI_DBG_CFG_2 register on T194, which isn't done by
hda_tegra_init(), and thus, this register may be in reset state after
resume from RPM suspend. It should be a bug in the HDA driver that needs
to be fixed.
On older SoCs: HDA resides in the APB power domain which could be
disabled only across system suspend/resume. HDA is only clock-gated
during runtime PM suspend.
On newer SoCs: HDA power state could be lost after RPM suspend/resume,
depending on the state of display. I'm wondering whether HDMI playback
works after DPMS on T194+, I assume this case was never tested properly.
It looks like it should be safe to reset HDA on runtime PM resume
regardless of the chip->running, and thus, we could remove that check
and reset HDA unconditionally. Will great if you could check/test and
improve this in the driver.
I'm also wondering whether snd_power_change_state() should be moved into
RPM callbacks and whether this function does anything practically useful
on Tegra at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-07 6:32 [PATCH 0/3] Fix Tegra194 HDA regression Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 6:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] ALSA: hda/tegra: Skip reset on BPMP devices Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 8:16 ` Thierry Reding
2021-12-07 8:36 ` Takashi Iwai
2021-12-07 9:09 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 10:22 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 10:44 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 10:58 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 11:02 ` Jon Hunter
2021-12-07 11:57 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 15:07 ` Jon Hunter
2021-12-07 12:00 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 12:05 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 12:40 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 14:07 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 14:49 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 15:35 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 17:37 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 18:02 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-08 5:22 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-08 12:05 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-14 6:02 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-14 6:09 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-14 6:15 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-14 7:22 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-14 13:56 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2021-12-14 14:29 ` Takashi Iwai
2021-12-14 15:34 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-20 10:32 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 6:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: sound: tegra: Update HDA resets Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 8:18 ` Thierry Reding
2021-12-07 9:27 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 10:14 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 11:04 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 12:02 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-12-07 12:22 ` Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 6:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: tegra: Remove non existent Tegra194 reset Sameer Pujar
2021-12-07 8:04 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix Tegra194 HDA regression Takashi Iwai
2021-12-07 8:21 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0761f6f2-27f8-4e1a-fabc-9d319f465a9e@gmail.com \
--to=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=spujar@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).