Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: interconnect: OSM L3: Add Eliza OSM L3 compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 24/02/2026 09:10, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 26-02-24 08:29:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:49:04AM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>> Eliza, similarly to SDM845, uses OSM hardware for L3 scaling.
>>> Document it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>>> index 4b9b98fbe8f2..6182599eb3c1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties:
>>>            - const: qcom,osm-l3
>>>        - items:
>>>            - enum:
>>> +              - qcom,eliza-epss-l3
>>
>> I see EPSS, not OSM here. This is also list without SDM845, so I don't
>> understand explanation in commit msg at all.
> 
> So there are two issues here:
> 
> 1. EPSS bindings are handled by the OSM schema. I believe this is by
> design as they basically do the same thing. Interconnect providers for
> L3 scaling. So the compatible is in the right schema.

We do not talk here about schema or bindings at all. Look at your commit
msg:
"uses OSM hardware"
so again: EPSS or OSM.

> 
> 2. The commit message should've said SM8650 instead. Will fix and
> respin.
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof