From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add SPI nodes to the exynos5420 device tree file Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:16:44 +0900 Message-ID: <086701cedf98$ab9d9f60$02d8de20$@org> References: <1377856637-7595-1-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <1377856637-7595-1-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Leela Krishna Amudala' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org, abrestic@chromium.org, t.figa@samsung.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: > > Add SPI device tree nodes to Exynos5420 SoC > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala > Reviewed-by: Andrew Bresticker > --- > Note: This patch is rebased on Kgene's for-next branch and is dependent on > [V3] ARM: dts: Add DMA controller node info on Exynos5420. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2851790/ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 51 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > index 15465f8..8d9e980 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ > pinctrl2 = &pinctrl_2; > pinctrl3 = &pinctrl_3; > pinctrl4 = &pinctrl_4; > + spi0 = &spi_0; > + spi1 = &spi_1; > + spi2 = &spi_2; > }; > > cpus { > @@ -238,6 +241,54 @@ > }; > }; > > + spi_0: spi@12d20000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-spi"; > + reg = <0x12d20000 0x100>; > + interrupts = <0 66 0>; > + dmas = <&pdma0 5 > + &pdma0 4>; > + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_bus>; > + clocks = <&clock 271>, <&clock 135>; > + clock-names = "spi", "spi_busclk0"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + spi_1: spi@12d30000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-spi"; > + reg = <0x12d30000 0x100>; > + interrupts = <0 67 0>; > + dmas = <&pdma1 5 > + &pdma1 4>; > + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&spi1_bus>; > + clocks = <&clock 272>, <&clock 136>; > + clock-names = "spi", "spi_busclk0"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + spi_2: spi@12d40000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-spi"; > + reg = <0x12d40000 0x100>; > + interrupts = <0 68 0>; > + dmas = <&pdma0 7 > + &pdma0 6>; > + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&spi2_bus>; > + clocks = <&clock 273>, <&clock 137>; > + clock-names = "spi", "spi_busclk0"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > serial@12C00000 { > clocks = <&clock 257>, <&clock 128>; > clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0"; > -- > 1.7.10.4 Leela, do you still want to keep the status 'disabled' for SPIs? Others look good to me. Thanks, Kukjin