From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m18063 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: switch to atomic PWM Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:05:58 +0300 Message-ID: <08b1036a-bb4d-5ae2-1a68-68ccdc0b3fef@microchip.com> References: <1490189375-20384-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1490189375-20384-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20170327150237.69d8523f@bbrezillon> <20170327131530.ifexyrgrp5egtbtr@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170327131530.ifexyrgrp5egtbtr@piout.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Alexandre Belloni , Boris Brezillon Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, tudor.ambarus@microchip.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, andrei.pistirica@microchip.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, cristian.birsan@microchip.com, galak@codeaurora.org, eugen.hristev@microchip.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 27.03.2017 16:15, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 27/03/2017 at 15:02:37 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: >> Hi Claudiu, >> >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:29:34 +0200 >> Claudiu Beznea wrote: >> >>> static const struct platform_device_id atmel_pwm_devtypes[] = { >>> { >>> .name = "at91sam9rl-pwm", >>> - .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v1, >>> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v1, >>> }, { >>> .name = "sama5d3-pwm", >>> - .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v2, >>> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v2, >>> }, { >>> /* sentinel */ >>> }, >> Unrelated to this series, but can you prepare a patch to get rid of >> this platform id table (AT91 platforms have completely switched to DT >> for quite some time now). >> > Please, don't until AVR32 is gone. Sure, I will wait for it. > >> You can also get rid of the "if (pdev->dev.of_node)" condition in >> atmel_pwm_probe() since it's guaranteed to be true, otherwise the >> ->probe() method wouldn't be called. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Boris