* [PATCH v1 0/3] Load cros_ec_ucsi from OF and ACPI definitions
@ 2025-03-12 19:59 Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation Jameson Thies
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jameson Thies @ 2025-03-12 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb,
Jameson Thies
The ChromeOS UCSI driver (cros_ec_ucsi) currently gets added as
subdevice of cros_ec_dev. But without it being defined by an ACPI
node or in the OF device tree, the typec connectors are not correctly
associated with other part of the device tree. This series updates the
cros_ec_ucsi driver to load based on device definitions in ACPI and OF.
It also changes the cros_ec_dev driver to block adding cros_ec_ucsi
as a subdevice if it is defined in the device tree.
Jameson Thies (3):
dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree
documentation
usb: typec: cros_ec_ucsi: Load driver from OF and ACPI definitions
mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
.../bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml | 13 +++++--
drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c | 26 ++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
base-commit: 9fc83373f0ffb8834da48b1446a5c2fef9525bb1
--
2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation
2025-03-12 19:59 [PATCH v1 0/3] Load cros_ec_ucsi from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
@ 2025-03-12 19:59 ` Jameson Thies
2025-03-13 7:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 7:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: typec: cros_ec_ucsi: Load driver from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI Jameson Thies
2 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jameson Thies @ 2025-03-12 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb,
Jameson Thies
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="y", Size: 1868 bytes --]
Add documentation for the cros-ec-ucsi device tree definition. Defining
this node will load the cros_ec_ucsi driver which is used for USB-C port
control on PDC based ChromeOS systems. Additionally, update mantainers
list to reflect changes to the ChromeOS USB owners.
Signed-off-by: Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
---
.../bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
index 9f9816fbecbc..ab39c5280681 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
@@ -8,17 +8,24 @@ title: Google Chrome OS EC(Embedded Controller) Type C port driver.
maintainers:
- Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
- - Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
+ - Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
+ - Łukasz Bartosik <ukaszb@chromium.org>
+ - Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
+ - Andrei Kuchynski <akuchynski@chromium.org>
description:
Chrome OS devices have an Embedded Controller(EC) which has access to
Type C port state. This node is intended to allow the host to read and
control the Type C ports. The node for this device should be under a
- cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi.
+ cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi. On TCPC systems, ChromeOS should
+ use cros-ec-typec. On PDC systems, ChromeOS should use cros-ec-ucsi.
properties:
compatible:
- const: google,cros-ec-typec
+ oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - const: google,cros-ec-typec
+ - const: google,cros-ec-ucsi
'#address-cells':
const: 1
--
2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: typec: cros_ec_ucsi: Load driver from OF and ACPI definitions
2025-03-12 19:59 [PATCH v1 0/3] Load cros_ec_ucsi from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation Jameson Thies
@ 2025-03-12 19:59 ` Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI Jameson Thies
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jameson Thies @ 2025-03-12 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb,
Jameson Thies
Add support for cros_ec_ucsi to load based on "google,cros-ec-ucsi"
compatible devices and "GOOG0021" ACPI nodes.
Signed-off-by: Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
---
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c
index c605c8616726..d916893b8908 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c
@@ -5,11 +5,13 @@
* Copyright 2024 Google LLC.
*/
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/container_of.h>
#include <linux/dev_printk.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_usbpd_notify.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h>
@@ -226,7 +228,6 @@ static void cros_ucsi_destroy(struct cros_ucsi_data *udata)
static int cros_ucsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct cros_ec_dev *ec_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
struct cros_ucsi_data *udata;
int ret;
@@ -236,7 +237,14 @@ static int cros_ucsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
udata->dev = dev;
- udata->ec = ec_data->ec_dev;
+ if (is_acpi_device_node(dev->fwnode) || is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ udata->ec = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+ } else {
+ struct cros_ec_dev *ec_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+ udata->ec = ec_data->ec_dev;
+ }
+
if (!udata->ec)
return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "couldn't find parent EC device\n");
@@ -317,10 +325,24 @@ static const struct platform_device_id cros_ucsi_id[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cros_ucsi_id);
+static const struct acpi_device_id cros_ec_ucsi_acpi_device_ids[] = {
+ { "GOOG0021", 0 },
+ { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cros_ec_ucsi_acpi_device_ids);
+
+static const struct of_device_id cros_ucsi_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "google,cros-ec-ucsi", },
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cros_ucsi_of_match);
+
static struct platform_driver cros_ucsi_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
.pm = &cros_ucsi_pm_ops,
+ .acpi_match_table = cros_ec_ucsi_acpi_device_ids,
+ .of_match_table = cros_ucsi_of_match,
},
.id_table = cros_ucsi_id,
.probe = cros_ucsi_probe,
--
2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
2025-03-12 19:59 [PATCH v1 0/3] Load cros_ec_ucsi from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: typec: cros_ec_ucsi: Load driver from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
@ 2025-03-12 19:59 ` Jameson Thies
2025-03-13 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
` (2 more replies)
2 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jameson Thies @ 2025-03-12 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb,
Jameson Thies
Check for cros_ec_ucsi to be defined in the OF device tree or an ACPI
node. If it is defined by either OF or ACPI, it does not need to be
added as a subdevice of cros_ec_dev.
Signed-off-by: Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
---
drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
index 9f84a52b48d6..5fb6cd20c5ec 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2014 Google, Inc.
*/
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
#include <linux/kconfig.h>
#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
@@ -128,11 +129,6 @@ static const struct cros_feature_to_cells cros_subdevices[] = {
.mfd_cells = cros_ec_rtc_cells,
.num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_rtc_cells),
},
- {
- .id = EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM,
- .mfd_cells = cros_ec_ucsi_cells,
- .num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_ucsi_cells),
- },
{
.id = EC_FEATURE_HANG_DETECT,
.mfd_cells = cros_ec_wdt_cells,
@@ -169,6 +165,15 @@ static const struct mfd_cell cros_ec_vbc_cells[] = {
{ .name = "cros-ec-vbc", }
};
+
+static int ucsi_acpi_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct acpi_device_id ucsi_acpi_device_ids[] = {
+ { "GOOG0021", 0 },
+ };
+ return !!acpi_match_device(ucsi_acpi_device_ids, dev);
+}
+
static void cros_ec_class_release(struct device *dev)
{
kfree(to_cros_ec_dev(dev));
@@ -256,6 +261,30 @@ static int ec_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
}
+ /*
+ * FW nodes can load cros_ec_ucsi, but early PDC devices did not define
+ * the required nodes. On PDC systems without FW nodes for cros_ec_ucsi,
+ * the driver should be added as an mfd subdevice.
+ */
+ if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD) &&
+ cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM)) {
+ struct device *acpi_dev = device_find_child(ec->ec_dev->dev,
+ NULL,
+ ucsi_acpi_match);
+
+ if (!!acpi_dev) {
+ put_device(acpi_dev);
+ } else if (!of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "google,cros-ec-ucsi")) {
+ retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
+ cros_ec_ucsi_cells,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_ucsi_cells));
+ if (retval)
+ dev_warn(ec->dev,
+ "failed to add cros_ec_ucsi: %d\n",
+ retval);
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* UCSI provides power supply information so we don't need to separately
* load the cros_usbpd_charger driver.
--
2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation Jameson Thies
@ 2025-03-13 7:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 7:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-03-13 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Thies, tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb
On 12/03/2025 20:59, Jameson Thies wrote:
> Add documentation for the cros-ec-ucsi device tree definition. Defining
> this node will load the cros_ec_ucsi driver which is used for USB-C port
Your patch does not do it at all.
> control on PDC based ChromeOS systems. Additionally, update mantainers
> list to reflect changes to the ChromeOS USB owners.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
You need to work on upstream, not downstream trees.
You CC-ed an address, which suggests you do not work on mainline kernel
or you do not use get_maintainers.pl/b4/patman. Please rebase and always
work on mainline or start using mentioned tools, so correct addresses
will be used.
> ---
> .../bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
> index 9f9816fbecbc..ab39c5280681 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.yaml
> @@ -8,17 +8,24 @@ title: Google Chrome OS EC(Embedded Controller) Type C port driver.
>
> maintainers:
> - Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
> - - Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
> + - Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
> + - Łukasz Bartosik <ukaszb@chromium.org>
> + - Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
> + - Andrei Kuchynski <akuchynski@chromium.org>
>
> description:
> Chrome OS devices have an Embedded Controller(EC) which has access to
> Type C port state. This node is intended to allow the host to read and
> control the Type C ports. The node for this device should be under a
> - cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi.
> + cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi. On TCPC systems, ChromeOS should
> + use cros-ec-typec. On PDC systems, ChromeOS should use cros-ec-ucsi.
What does it mean? How is it related to description?
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - const: google,cros-ec-typec
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: google,cros-ec-typec
> + - const: google,cros-ec-ucsi
I don't understand at all why you are growing now this with fallback.
And if you tested your patch, you would see it does not make any sense.
NAK, test your patches before posting.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI Jameson Thies
@ 2025-03-13 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 7:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 14:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-13 16:07 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-03-13 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Thies, tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb
On 12/03/2025 20:59, Jameson Thies wrote:
> Check for cros_ec_ucsi to be defined in the OF device tree or an ACPI
> node. If it is defined by either OF or ACPI, it does not need to be
> added as a subdevice of cros_ec_dev.
No, it does not have to. You just populate the children and appropriate
devices will be created automatically. None of parent devices should
ever check if the child exist to create a child - it makes no sense.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation Jameson Thies
2025-03-13 7:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-03-13 7:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 23:23 ` Jameson Thies
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-03-13 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Thies, tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb
On 12/03/2025 20:59, Jameson Thies wrote:
> Add documentation for the cros-ec-ucsi device tree definition. Defining
> this node will load the cros_ec_ucsi driver which is used for USB-C port
> control on PDC based ChromeOS systems. Additionally, update mantainers
> list to reflect changes to the ChromeOS USB owners.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
> ---
Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
explained here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "device tree documentation".
The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are "device tree
documentation".
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
2025-03-13 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-03-13 7:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-03-13 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Thies, tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb
On 13/03/2025 08:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/03/2025 20:59, Jameson Thies wrote:
>> Check for cros_ec_ucsi to be defined in the OF device tree or an ACPI
>> node. If it is defined by either OF or ACPI, it does not need to be
>> added as a subdevice of cros_ec_dev.
>
> No, it does not have to. You just populate the children and appropriate
Uh, I did not notice that it is !of_find_compatible_node(), so this
comment should be rephrased - you just add MFD children anyway and if
there is no node, they won't be created.
> devices will be created automatically. None of parent devices should
> ever check if the child exist to create a child - it makes no sense.
This is still valid - none of parents should be poking around to see if
there is a child or not. The core handles it, DT handles it etc.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI Jameson Thies
2025-03-13 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-03-13 14:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-13 16:07 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-03-13 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Thies, tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel,
linux-usb, Jameson Thies
Hi Jameson,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 9fc83373f0ffb8834da48b1446a5c2fef9525bb1]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jameson-Thies/dt-bindings-Add-cros-ec-ucsi-to-cros-ec-typec-device-tree-documentation/20250313-040216
base: 9fc83373f0ffb8834da48b1446a5c2fef9525bb1
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250312195951.1579682-4-jthies%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250313 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250313/202503132256.f6p359iT-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250313/202503132256.f6p359iT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503132256.f6p359iT-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c: In function 'ec_device_probe':
>> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c:273:61: error: passing argument 3 of 'device_find_child' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
273 | ucsi_acpi_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int (*)(struct device *, void *)
In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14,
from drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c:8:
include/linux/device.h:1101:49: note: expected 'device_match_t' {aka 'int (*)(struct device *, const void *)'} but argument is of type 'int (*)(struct device *, void *)'
1101 | device_match_t match);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/device_find_child +273 drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
181
182 static int ec_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
183 {
184 int retval = -ENOMEM;
185 struct device_node *node;
186 struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
187 struct cros_ec_platform *ec_platform = dev_get_platdata(dev);
188 struct cros_ec_dev *ec = kzalloc(sizeof(*ec), GFP_KERNEL);
189 struct ec_response_pchg_count pchg_count;
190 int i;
191
192 if (!ec)
193 return retval;
194
195 dev_set_drvdata(dev, ec);
196 ec->ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
197 ec->dev = dev;
198 ec->cmd_offset = ec_platform->cmd_offset;
199 ec->features.flags[0] = -1U; /* Not cached yet */
200 ec->features.flags[1] = -1U; /* Not cached yet */
201 device_initialize(&ec->class_dev);
202
203 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cros_mcu_devices); i++) {
204 /*
205 * Check whether this is actually a dedicated MCU rather
206 * than an standard EC.
207 */
208 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, cros_mcu_devices[i].id)) {
209 dev_info(dev, "CrOS %s MCU detected\n",
210 cros_mcu_devices[i].desc);
211 /*
212 * Help userspace differentiating ECs from other MCU,
213 * regardless of the probing order.
214 */
215 ec_platform->ec_name = cros_mcu_devices[i].name;
216 break;
217 }
218 }
219
220 /*
221 * Add the class device
222 */
223 ec->class_dev.class = &cros_class;
224 ec->class_dev.parent = dev;
225 ec->class_dev.release = cros_ec_class_release;
226
227 retval = dev_set_name(&ec->class_dev, "%s", ec_platform->ec_name);
228 if (retval) {
229 dev_err(dev, "dev_set_name failed => %d\n", retval);
230 goto failed;
231 }
232
233 retval = device_add(&ec->class_dev);
234 if (retval)
235 goto failed;
236
237 /* check whether this EC is a sensor hub. */
238 if (cros_ec_get_sensor_count(ec) > 0) {
239 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
240 cros_ec_sensorhub_cells,
241 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_sensorhub_cells));
242 if (retval)
243 dev_err(ec->dev, "failed to add %s subdevice: %d\n",
244 cros_ec_sensorhub_cells->name, retval);
245 }
246
247 /*
248 * The following subdevices can be detected by sending the
249 * EC_FEATURE_GET_CMD Embedded Controller device.
250 */
251 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cros_subdevices); i++) {
252 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, cros_subdevices[i].id)) {
253 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
254 cros_subdevices[i].mfd_cells,
255 cros_subdevices[i].num_cells);
256 if (retval)
257 dev_err(ec->dev,
258 "failed to add %s subdevice: %d\n",
259 cros_subdevices[i].mfd_cells->name,
260 retval);
261 }
262 }
263
264 /*
265 * FW nodes can load cros_ec_ucsi, but early PDC devices did not define
266 * the required nodes. On PDC systems without FW nodes for cros_ec_ucsi,
267 * the driver should be added as an mfd subdevice.
268 */
269 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD) &&
270 cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM)) {
271 struct device *acpi_dev = device_find_child(ec->ec_dev->dev,
272 NULL,
> 273 ucsi_acpi_match);
274
275 if (!!acpi_dev) {
276 put_device(acpi_dev);
277 } else if (!of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "google,cros-ec-ucsi")) {
278 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
279 cros_ec_ucsi_cells,
280 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_ucsi_cells));
281 if (retval)
282 dev_warn(ec->dev,
283 "failed to add cros_ec_ucsi: %d\n",
284 retval);
285 }
286 }
287
288 /*
289 * UCSI provides power supply information so we don't need to separately
290 * load the cros_usbpd_charger driver.
291 */
292 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD) &&
293 !cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM)) {
294 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
295 cros_usbpd_charger_cells,
296 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_usbpd_charger_cells));
297
298 if (retval)
299 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add usbpd-charger: %d\n",
300 retval);
301 }
302
303 /*
304 * Lightbar is a special case. Newer devices support autodetection,
305 * but older ones do not.
306 */
307 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_LIGHTBAR) ||
308 dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Link")) {
309 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
310 cros_ec_lightbar_cells,
311 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_lightbar_cells));
312 if (retval)
313 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add lightbar: %d\n",
314 retval);
315 }
316
317 /*
318 * The PD notifier driver cell is separate since it only needs to be
319 * explicitly added on platforms that don't have the PD notifier ACPI
320 * device entry defined.
321 */
322 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && ec->ec_dev->dev->of_node) {
323 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD)) {
324 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
325 cros_usbpd_notify_cells,
326 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_usbpd_notify_cells));
327 if (retval)
328 dev_err(ec->dev,
329 "failed to add PD notify devices: %d\n",
330 retval);
331 }
332 }
333
334 /*
335 * The PCHG device cannot be detected by sending EC_FEATURE_GET_CMD, but
336 * it can be detected by querying the number of peripheral chargers.
337 */
338 retval = cros_ec_cmd(ec->ec_dev, 0, EC_CMD_PCHG_COUNT, NULL, 0,
339 &pchg_count, sizeof(pchg_count));
340 if (retval >= 0 && pchg_count.port_count) {
341 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
342 cros_ec_pchg_cells,
343 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_pchg_cells));
344 if (retval)
345 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add pchg: %d\n",
346 retval);
347 }
348
349 /*
350 * The following subdevices cannot be detected by sending the
351 * EC_FEATURE_GET_CMD to the Embedded Controller device.
352 */
353 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev, cros_ec_platform_cells,
354 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_platform_cells));
355 if (retval)
356 dev_warn(ec->dev,
357 "failed to add cros-ec platform devices: %d\n",
358 retval);
359
360 /* Check whether this EC instance has a VBC NVRAM */
361 node = ec->ec_dev->dev->of_node;
362 if (of_property_read_bool(node, "google,has-vbc-nvram")) {
363 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev, cros_ec_vbc_cells,
364 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_vbc_cells));
365 if (retval)
366 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add VBC devices: %d\n",
367 retval);
368 }
369
370 return 0;
371
372 failed:
373 put_device(&ec->class_dev);
374 return retval;
375 }
376
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI Jameson Thies
2025-03-13 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 14:53 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-03-13 16:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-13 23:29 ` Jameson Thies
2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-03-13 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Thies, tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel,
linux-usb, Jameson Thies
Hi Jameson,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 9fc83373f0ffb8834da48b1446a5c2fef9525bb1]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jameson-Thies/dt-bindings-Add-cros-ec-ucsi-to-cros-ec-typec-device-tree-documentation/20250313-040216
base: 9fc83373f0ffb8834da48b1446a5c2fef9525bb1
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250312195951.1579682-4-jthies%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20250313 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250313/202503132357.RnlF5A0E-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250313/202503132357.RnlF5A0E-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503132357.RnlF5A0E-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c:273:12: error: incompatible function pointer types passing 'int (struct device *, void *)' to parameter of type 'device_match_t' (aka 'int (*)(struct device *, const void *)') [-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types]
273 | ucsi_acpi_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/device.h:1101:21: note: passing argument to parameter 'match' here
1101 | device_match_t match);
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +273 drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
181
182 static int ec_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
183 {
184 int retval = -ENOMEM;
185 struct device_node *node;
186 struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
187 struct cros_ec_platform *ec_platform = dev_get_platdata(dev);
188 struct cros_ec_dev *ec = kzalloc(sizeof(*ec), GFP_KERNEL);
189 struct ec_response_pchg_count pchg_count;
190 int i;
191
192 if (!ec)
193 return retval;
194
195 dev_set_drvdata(dev, ec);
196 ec->ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
197 ec->dev = dev;
198 ec->cmd_offset = ec_platform->cmd_offset;
199 ec->features.flags[0] = -1U; /* Not cached yet */
200 ec->features.flags[1] = -1U; /* Not cached yet */
201 device_initialize(&ec->class_dev);
202
203 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cros_mcu_devices); i++) {
204 /*
205 * Check whether this is actually a dedicated MCU rather
206 * than an standard EC.
207 */
208 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, cros_mcu_devices[i].id)) {
209 dev_info(dev, "CrOS %s MCU detected\n",
210 cros_mcu_devices[i].desc);
211 /*
212 * Help userspace differentiating ECs from other MCU,
213 * regardless of the probing order.
214 */
215 ec_platform->ec_name = cros_mcu_devices[i].name;
216 break;
217 }
218 }
219
220 /*
221 * Add the class device
222 */
223 ec->class_dev.class = &cros_class;
224 ec->class_dev.parent = dev;
225 ec->class_dev.release = cros_ec_class_release;
226
227 retval = dev_set_name(&ec->class_dev, "%s", ec_platform->ec_name);
228 if (retval) {
229 dev_err(dev, "dev_set_name failed => %d\n", retval);
230 goto failed;
231 }
232
233 retval = device_add(&ec->class_dev);
234 if (retval)
235 goto failed;
236
237 /* check whether this EC is a sensor hub. */
238 if (cros_ec_get_sensor_count(ec) > 0) {
239 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
240 cros_ec_sensorhub_cells,
241 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_sensorhub_cells));
242 if (retval)
243 dev_err(ec->dev, "failed to add %s subdevice: %d\n",
244 cros_ec_sensorhub_cells->name, retval);
245 }
246
247 /*
248 * The following subdevices can be detected by sending the
249 * EC_FEATURE_GET_CMD Embedded Controller device.
250 */
251 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cros_subdevices); i++) {
252 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, cros_subdevices[i].id)) {
253 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
254 cros_subdevices[i].mfd_cells,
255 cros_subdevices[i].num_cells);
256 if (retval)
257 dev_err(ec->dev,
258 "failed to add %s subdevice: %d\n",
259 cros_subdevices[i].mfd_cells->name,
260 retval);
261 }
262 }
263
264 /*
265 * FW nodes can load cros_ec_ucsi, but early PDC devices did not define
266 * the required nodes. On PDC systems without FW nodes for cros_ec_ucsi,
267 * the driver should be added as an mfd subdevice.
268 */
269 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD) &&
270 cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM)) {
271 struct device *acpi_dev = device_find_child(ec->ec_dev->dev,
272 NULL,
> 273 ucsi_acpi_match);
274
275 if (!!acpi_dev) {
276 put_device(acpi_dev);
277 } else if (!of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "google,cros-ec-ucsi")) {
278 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
279 cros_ec_ucsi_cells,
280 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_ucsi_cells));
281 if (retval)
282 dev_warn(ec->dev,
283 "failed to add cros_ec_ucsi: %d\n",
284 retval);
285 }
286 }
287
288 /*
289 * UCSI provides power supply information so we don't need to separately
290 * load the cros_usbpd_charger driver.
291 */
292 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD) &&
293 !cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM)) {
294 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
295 cros_usbpd_charger_cells,
296 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_usbpd_charger_cells));
297
298 if (retval)
299 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add usbpd-charger: %d\n",
300 retval);
301 }
302
303 /*
304 * Lightbar is a special case. Newer devices support autodetection,
305 * but older ones do not.
306 */
307 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_LIGHTBAR) ||
308 dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Link")) {
309 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
310 cros_ec_lightbar_cells,
311 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_lightbar_cells));
312 if (retval)
313 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add lightbar: %d\n",
314 retval);
315 }
316
317 /*
318 * The PD notifier driver cell is separate since it only needs to be
319 * explicitly added on platforms that don't have the PD notifier ACPI
320 * device entry defined.
321 */
322 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && ec->ec_dev->dev->of_node) {
323 if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD)) {
324 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
325 cros_usbpd_notify_cells,
326 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_usbpd_notify_cells));
327 if (retval)
328 dev_err(ec->dev,
329 "failed to add PD notify devices: %d\n",
330 retval);
331 }
332 }
333
334 /*
335 * The PCHG device cannot be detected by sending EC_FEATURE_GET_CMD, but
336 * it can be detected by querying the number of peripheral chargers.
337 */
338 retval = cros_ec_cmd(ec->ec_dev, 0, EC_CMD_PCHG_COUNT, NULL, 0,
339 &pchg_count, sizeof(pchg_count));
340 if (retval >= 0 && pchg_count.port_count) {
341 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev,
342 cros_ec_pchg_cells,
343 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_pchg_cells));
344 if (retval)
345 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add pchg: %d\n",
346 retval);
347 }
348
349 /*
350 * The following subdevices cannot be detected by sending the
351 * EC_FEATURE_GET_CMD to the Embedded Controller device.
352 */
353 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev, cros_ec_platform_cells,
354 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_platform_cells));
355 if (retval)
356 dev_warn(ec->dev,
357 "failed to add cros-ec platform devices: %d\n",
358 retval);
359
360 /* Check whether this EC instance has a VBC NVRAM */
361 node = ec->ec_dev->dev->of_node;
362 if (of_property_read_bool(node, "google,has-vbc-nvram")) {
363 retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(ec->dev, cros_ec_vbc_cells,
364 ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_vbc_cells));
365 if (retval)
366 dev_warn(ec->dev, "failed to add VBC devices: %d\n",
367 retval);
368 }
369
370 return 0;
371
372 failed:
373 put_device(&ec->class_dev);
374 return retval;
375 }
376
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation
2025-03-13 7:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-03-13 23:23 ` Jameson Thies
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jameson Thies @ 2025-03-13 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski, devicetree,
chrome-platform, linux-kernel, linux-usb
Hi Krzysztof, thank you for taking a look at this series. Clearly it
needs some more work. I’ll follow up with a v2 addressing your
comments.
> > - cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi.
> > + cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi. On TCPC systems, ChromeOS should
> > + use cros-ec-typec. On PDC systems, ChromeOS should use cros-ec-ucsi.
>
> What does it mean? How is it related to description?
TCPCs and PDCs are different components which can be used for power
delivery messaging on USB-C ports. On ChromeOS devices, they are
mutually exclusive. This line is just saying which driver should be
chosen based on the USB-C port hardware. But, I see that type of
information isn’t really relevant for the device tree documentation.
Thanks,
Jameson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
2025-03-13 16:07 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-03-13 23:29 ` Jameson Thies
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jameson Thies @ 2025-03-13 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: tzungbi, ukaszb, bleung, heikki.krogerus, robh+dt,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt, groeck, swboyd, akuchynski, llvm,
oe-kbuild-all, devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-kernel,
linux-usb
Echoing my response on patch 1/3, thank you for taking a look at this.
I’ll follow up with a v2 series to address your comments and resolve
the build issues. Additional responses below.
> > devices will be created automatically. None of parent devices should
> > ever check if the child exist to create a child - it makes no sense.
>
> This is still valid - none of parents should be poking around to see if
> there is a child or not. The core handles it, DT handles it etc.
>
Understood, we can remove this for DT. We need to keep part of this
check for ACPI because there are platforms which need this driver and
haven't defined proper ACPI nodes in their FW to load cros_ec_ucsi.
Thanks,
Jameson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI
2025-09-30 1:23 [PATCH v1 0/3] Load cros_ec_ucsi from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
@ 2025-09-30 1:23 ` Jameson Thies
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jameson Thies @ 2025-09-30 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akuchynski, abhishekpandit, krzk+dt, robh, bleung,
heikki.krogerus, ukaszb, tzungbi
Cc: devicetree, chrome-platform, linux-usb, linux-kernel,
Jameson Thies
On devices with a UCSI PPM in the EC, check for cros_ec_ucsi to be
defined in the OF device tree or an ACPI node. If it is defined by
either OF or ACPI, it does not need to be added as a subdevice of
cros_ec_dev.
Signed-off-by: Jameson Thies <jthies@google.com>
---
drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
index dc80a272726b..b0523f6541d2 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2014 Google, Inc.
*/
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
#include <linux/kconfig.h>
#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
@@ -131,11 +132,6 @@ static const struct cros_feature_to_cells cros_subdevices[] = {
.mfd_cells = cros_ec_rtc_cells,
.num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_rtc_cells),
},
- {
- .id = EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM,
- .mfd_cells = cros_ec_ucsi_cells,
- .num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_ucsi_cells),
- },
{
.id = EC_FEATURE_HANG_DETECT,
.mfd_cells = cros_ec_wdt_cells,
@@ -177,6 +173,16 @@ static const struct mfd_cell cros_ec_vbc_cells[] = {
{ .name = "cros-ec-vbc", }
};
+static int ucsi_acpi_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
+{
+ struct acpi_device_id ucsi_acpi_device_ids[] = {
+ { "GOOG0021", 0 },
+ {"", 0},
+ };
+ return !!acpi_match_device(ucsi_acpi_device_ids, dev);
+}
+
+
static void cros_ec_class_release(struct device *dev)
{
kfree(to_cros_ec_dev(dev));
@@ -264,6 +270,30 @@ static int ec_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
}
+ /*
+ * FW nodes can load cros_ec_ucsi, but early PDC devices did not define
+ * the required nodes. On PDC systems without FW nodes for cros_ec_ucsi,
+ * the driver should be added as an mfd subdevice.
+ */
+ if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_USB_PD) &&
+ cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_UCSI_PPM)) {
+ struct device *acpi_dev = device_find_child(ec->ec_dev->dev,
+ NULL,
+ ucsi_acpi_match);
+
+ if (!!acpi_dev) {
+ put_device(acpi_dev);
+ } else if (!of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
+ "google,cros-ec-ucsi")) {
+ retval = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(
+ ec->dev, cros_ec_ucsi_cells,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(cros_ec_ucsi_cells));
+ if (retval)
+ dev_warn(ec->dev,
+ "failed to add cros_ec_ucsi: %d\n", retval);
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* UCSI provides power supply information so we don't need to separately
* load the cros_usbpd_charger driver.
--
2.51.0.570.gb178f27e6d-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-30 1:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-12 19:59 [PATCH v1 0/3] Load cros_ec_ucsi from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Add cros-ec-ucsi to cros-ec-typec device tree documentation Jameson Thies
2025-03-13 7:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 7:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 23:23 ` Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: typec: cros_ec_ucsi: Load driver from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
2025-03-12 19:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI Jameson Thies
2025-03-13 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 7:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 14:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-13 16:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-13 23:29 ` Jameson Thies
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-30 1:23 [PATCH v1 0/3] Load cros_ec_ucsi from OF and ACPI definitions Jameson Thies
2025-09-30 1:23 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: cros_ec: Don't add cros_ec_ucsi if it is defined in OF or ACPI Jameson Thies
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).