From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1541FC433FE for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 03:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230127AbiKID7Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 22:59:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41330 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229934AbiKID7Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 22:59:24 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com (fllv0015.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.141]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F4531A838; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 19:59:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2A93wZeU058517; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 21:58:35 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1667966315; bh=J2NoIk3al2GZi8pyjsvOAoLOl2pIUpuW02w5w7hO/NM=; h=Date:CC:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=YJgfda5lIxYSCIHeSbIBup5BB/iEox2tOMfHb3H6qINGRerja9ZpyfB+dIEWYcGcH hZ2lfYvZ/sYfL0me2mvRZ1rpL5TEKdYWtHQvhJLCzTMImIDCc4YAHwHuZFjAq35PWk rs5bkVR/J55pSXGZ1LOOSGU8lfxP9wW8wUglJM7o= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 2A93wZnh018528 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 21:58:35 -0600 Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.6; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 21:58:35 -0600 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.6 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 21:58:35 -0600 Received: from [172.24.145.61] (ileaxei01-snat.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.5]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2A93wUaX031793; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 21:58:31 -0600 Message-ID: <0979ccdc-da5c-8dfa-1be1-e385be085372@ti.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 09:28:29 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for QSGMII mode for J721e CPSW9G to am65-cpsw driver To: Jakub Kicinski References: <20221108080606.124596-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com> <20221108175343.57f3998d@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Siddharth Vadapalli In-Reply-To: <20221108175343.57f3998d@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello Jakub, On 09/11/22 07:23, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:36:03 +0530 Siddharth Vadapalli wrote: >> 2. Rebase series on linux-next tree tagged: next-20221107. > > You need to based on the tree which you're expecting to apply the patch. > Which should be net-next here- throw that into the subject while at it > ([PATCH net-next v5 0/3] ....). v4 does not apply cleanly. I will rebase the series on the net-next tree and use "PATCH net-next" in the subject and then post the v5 series. It looks like a few patches got merged to the net-next tree after I had posted my series. Regards, Siddharth.