From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add minimal dts/dtsi files for sdm845 SoC and MTP Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:27:05 +0530 Message-ID: <0cfcb7ce-9da8-c49a-7df7-4749d07cd365@codeaurora.org> References: <20180216060503.22006-1-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <20180216060503.22006-4-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <20180219163651.66936056@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Doug Anderson , Andy Gross Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , LKML , evgreen@chromium.org, Bjorn Andersson , Linux ARM List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/22/2018 04:53 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> + interrupts = ; >> >> Please do not use IRQ_TYPE_NONE, ever. It doesn't exist in the GIC >> binding. Set it to the actual trigger value. >> > >>> + interrupts = ; >> >> Same here. > > Thanks for the review Marc! > > > Andy: If I'm reading everything correctly you're the one who would > collect these patches and apply them. Is that right? Do they look OK > to you in general? Would you prefer that Rajendra send out a v5 with > the fixes pointed out by Marc, or would you prefer to fix them up > yourself when applying? Is now a good time or would you prefer to > wait? I just fixed up to remove all instances of IRQ_TYPE_NONE and sent a v5 out. > > Thanks! :) > > -Doug > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation