From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sai Prakash Ranjan Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU phandle Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:51:56 +0530 Message-ID: <0e33a1f2-f535-91e3-635d-dc8852833a0b@codeaurora.org> References: <0a20cf9eb34b14a191381af98af1694bbc222734.1561610498.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexander Shishkin , linux-arm-msm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Brown , Rob Herring , Sibi Sankar , Vivek Gautam , Leo Yan , linux-arm-kernel List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 6/27/2019 10:54 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > I want to apply your code to my tree but it isn't easy for me to do > so. Did you notice the checkpatch.pl warning about the DT bindings > being in a separate patch? In this case it is not a new binding but > following the process gives the DT maintainers the opportunity to at > least look at your patch. Because the changes are trivial they may > decide to ignore it but that choice it theirs to make. > Hmm, git log on coresight dt-bindings showed some examples like this where bindings were updated in the same patch. Anyways, I have separated out the patch now and resent v5. Thanks, Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation