From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Marcelo Schmitt" <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>,
"Michael Hennerich" <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Sean Anderson" <sean.anderson@linux.dev>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] spi: axi-spi-engine: support SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:59:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e59d92f-7b3c-4ff6-b3ad-7fae2ded9b77@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRNSc1GEz0UNx17i@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
On 11/11/25 9:12 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> The updates to spi-engine driver look good.
> Only one comment about what happens if we have conflicting bus modes for the
> offload case. Just to check I'm getting how this is working.
>
...
>> @@ -284,6 +316,24 @@ static int spi_engine_precompile_message(struct spi_message *msg)
>> min_bits_per_word = min(min_bits_per_word, xfer->bits_per_word);
>> max_bits_per_word = max(max_bits_per_word, xfer->bits_per_word);
>> }
>> +
>> + if (xfer->rx_buf || xfer->offload_flags & SPI_OFFLOAD_XFER_RX_STREAM ||
>> + xfer->tx_buf || xfer->offload_flags & SPI_OFFLOAD_XFER_TX_STREAM) {
>> + switch (xfer->multi_bus_mode) {
>> + case SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_SINGLE:
>> + case SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE:
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + /* Other modes, like mirror not supported */
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* If all xfers have the same multi-bus mode, we can optimize. */
>> + if (multi_bus_mode == SPI_ENGINE_MULTI_BUS_MODE_UNKNOWN)
>> + multi_bus_mode = xfer->multi_bus_mode;
>> + else if (multi_bus_mode != xfer->multi_bus_mode)
>> + multi_bus_mode = SPI_ENGINE_MULTI_BUS_MODE_CONFLICTING;
>
> Here we check all xfers have the same multi-bus mode and keep the mode that has
> been set. Otherwise, we set this conflicting mode and the intent is to generate
> SDI and SDO mask commands on demand on spi_engine_precompile_message(). OTOH,
s/spi_engine_precompile_message/spi_engine_compile_message/
Probably just a typo, but just to be clear, the "on demand" bit happens in the
compile function rather than precompile.
> if all xfers have the same multi-bus mode, we can add just one pair of SDI/SDO
> mask commands in spi_engine_trigger_enable() and one pair latter in
> spi_engine_trigger_disable(). I guess this is the optimization mentioned in the
> comment.
>
Your understanding is correct.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 20:52 [PATCH v2 0/6] spi: add multi-bus support David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-data-buses property David Lechner
2025-11-18 15:57 ` Rob Herring
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] spi: Support multi-bus controllers David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] spi: add multi_bus_mode field to struct spi_transfer David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] spi: axi-spi-engine: support SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE David Lechner
2025-11-11 15:12 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-11-12 16:59 ` David Lechner [this message]
2025-11-15 14:16 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-11-15 14:17 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad7380: add spi-buses property David Lechner
2025-11-18 15:59 ` Rob Herring
2025-11-18 17:46 ` David Lechner
2025-11-19 13:18 ` Rob Herring
2025-11-19 14:45 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 14:28 ` Rob Herring
2025-12-04 16:01 ` David Lechner
2025-11-07 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: adc: ad7380: Add support for multiple SPI buses David Lechner
2025-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] spi: add multi-bus support Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e59d92f-7b3c-4ff6-b3ad-7fae2ded9b77@baylibre.com \
--to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt@analog.com \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).