Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rtq6056: add support for the whole RTQ6056 family

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 26/12/2023 12:19, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 10:18:47AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/12/2023 04:47, cy_huang@richtek.com wrote:
>>> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
>>>
>>> Add compatible support for RTQ6053 and RTQ6059.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml         | 5 ++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml
>>> index 88e008629ea8..d1e1f36d1972 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml
>>> @@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ description: |
>>>  
>>>  properties:
>>>    compatible:
>>> -    const: richtek,rtq6056
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - richtek,rtq6053
>>> +      - richtek,rtq6056
>>
>> Aren't these devices compatible? Your driver change says they are, so
>> express compatibility with list here (and oneOf).
>>
> Thanks, I try to take other binding as the reference. One more question.
> If rtq6053 is compatible with rtq6056, there's only chip package type difference.
> Do I need to seperate it into a dedicated enum element?
> Or just put it into one item and said this part number is compatible with rtq6056? 

See example-schema. You need enum and items, both in oneOf:.

Best regards,
Krzysztof