From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38A3ECDFA1 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229610AbiJVPpl (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:45:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56798 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229449AbiJVPpl (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:45:41 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x2c.google.com (mail-oa1-x2c.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3392718DD6E for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x2c.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-13b6c1c89bdso1269972fac.13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:45:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BVu4XTuwWJr/YwyXL2uAxp+NUft8bZEEOp2Ycu+REmM=; b=Q2BgzvRzkSWli269QFsGDIojuLbvHjW9Ea9ghjGGwo9WYK/D5Zc/5LR6oX+WqsTm9h 3qIFiH0EjPeHTaRzTVYOltZfC/N/gMElNtdN2chpi3/EnA4SI64k6yyz1YCV67fowdkX EeM9cv2WXkn4oD/ILMPrnLBDlBNi5UU0OX6QmqZtCRvjRnO4oBiWewkxqUUhEvgngpxv XJU7/5njXfWqo5I1VEJBrX+6Z862mRWNc2AMYPantnfpIlwM8L0FQlzvx977dDD/zPHO zEiVnP4fxO9Bo4d9s6onoAP7anRFDgTEYa+ZuEfLcV1YYckzHVc38nYkCh5+hb7zKkO0 zzjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BVu4XTuwWJr/YwyXL2uAxp+NUft8bZEEOp2Ycu+REmM=; b=kkTthcI+vgG04F9UiYSjXXoprh/OVO94JMobq1sXDevJR9eTe8kRaLQ2Oc3b1JcSmz Zexk5rvqnYKkEmK/aAnOcP2cG0UIDD7aYHUCXrSHtWWdT+tGOJqD7RGUEUBskR5ijGkx NFWV6JUHDppBtT86L3hYme9aNktbBQeiVDsvTartg47FWeW8R4lxVMGUDfYq8bXgQtiz geBSS58R4Cv5tyXbDNP86ir6gp6cN62M8K8/3wLS8BqGrKn677oC6ZZXGMLB23CKtxmi ShPtbSWA041wSb2+qhgSARPC8n3XDyoKB+cUo7z1xZl4m335RV3RWplkvvXMBtRlksuk +eIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1PaFiUxs6I2c0AVsyRMzHPI95h+1BAkhkS903pCZvWkNa5gRbi pr0uiFYMANhxfdVGuZYPClyQLQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM54Jr40A+CvqVTyLVkSLJxKugf4BweTxa+vKcieHD0b/jTZxNFDPAfxieTiJOd6kzA5D45GJg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b4ac:b0:13b:151c:d1b5 with SMTP id y44-20020a056870b4ac00b0013b151cd1b5mr7328351oap.205.1666453536789; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.203.8.70] ([205.153.95.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5-20020a9d2085000000b00661c0747545sm2404098ota.44.2022.10.22.08.45.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0fa65ec4-b735-4859-401b-da14899ed921@linaro.org> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:45:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 bindings Content-Language: en-US To: Dmitry Baryshkov , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Clark Cc: Vinod Koul , Sai Prakash Ranjan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20221021165534.2334329-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> <20221021165534.2334329-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20221021165534.2334329-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 21/10/2022 12:55, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > Add generic bindings for the Qualcomm variant of the ARM MMU-500. It is > expected that all future platforms will use the generic qcom,smmu-500 > compat string in addition to SoC-specific and the generic arm,mmu-500 > ones. Older bindings are now described as deprecated. > > Note: I have split the sdx55 and sdx65 from the legacy bindings. They > are not supported by the qcom SMMU implementation. I can suppose that > they are using the generic implementation rather than the > Qualcomm-speicific one. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof