From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FF6C433FE for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235472AbiBRNkm (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:40:42 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:60758 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235821AbiBRNki (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:40:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F8E829693B; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 05:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id m27so2870001wrb.4; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 05:40:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GafMyxIWmc4jQRLJIu37KnZfUQv6P8zM1b/LNvntbUA=; b=Cwpf1rGQNNaBjj8uN5Iz8V8VJimuKe/SIXiUcYmHL3kAmqPF6KBhxpeFa9nBVkQhCr j1luzT557/a6s0m13CZin4aywwCzzWzbnWyTdIqVN5esv63nBbvHrUShKfZ2xjBuTXA4 Ih9OURpjjhQe9La2y4/KdQTLGM4EVW4ewndChcx9nmwUY/Xq3WgoOLXxPOHDFsztfubC vHyGBb83M8YPXN4tVC1C+bNHqPByQCEpetzFs0whX8pn2/pepUqnJhMwOUeo1/oPWPdG fYgP7zmnvPb41rCMMXzyKvqwORQZhBlWx79s4XQ54vyWDAFNB4+MFiOxqwqWJoJ5GpCJ 9e2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GafMyxIWmc4jQRLJIu37KnZfUQv6P8zM1b/LNvntbUA=; b=2x4Mu8ls1I89e8bEZ65bo8aziBYJCW9rArih5w/jVfqxajWsE9Tn1ZNYgVnbgrx1Dp rl+rGizxBSRn4mFQlKsf7vkG2U3vvDwrVjyX3kyij4JF638Lb2LlBs85YYa9uRNITAXV O9Wc8dZ2KKYM+XpLZZ84Lbgw+OUchjPhfT37U0f2tx1htEVlIoYm0N6HC64WCY4v+D8h GWeTcKs8z+kcO4Qp4MqkPfRmveeX9u/y/iIWpi5g4WmppWCMYHu+vbK5v7WQ8wxpwx5c WSrordjtQNS6n57HolVZqGBxiZ5gIxKRLnfazKNFCpKOcabHz1oR5L+ymrrg2EsaodSH CXSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dgAPbQHXxIIfaeXZ0RuZwwAwdhj9B1qLLdpqji3acUbSp3ciR kF2vx/J7hl2u3SvsTG9xk20= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdtCVMJWGY6BQSdkSSMYQg2m/W2LFKHvjOXkIXcMwNI1+zjPnJ/ioaioc2fNN6C/0NsHvlpw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6cd0:0:b0:1e3:11b3:418c with SMTP id c16-20020a5d6cd0000000b001e311b3418cmr6105638wrc.405.1645191620722; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 05:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:a61:2b1c:9001:b4fc:bdc6:aa9f:ec65? ([2001:a61:2b1c:9001:b4fc:bdc6:aa9f:ec65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t1sm50247776wre.45.2022.02.18.05.40.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 05:40:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0fdb9ce85efc251a0f461f25d5cc361ec70af8d7.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: dac: add support for ltc2688 From: Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: "Sa, Nuno" , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , "Hennerich, Michael" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:40:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20220121142501.151-1-nuno.sa@analog.com> <20220121142501.151-2-nuno.sa@analog.com> <0fc9da519df96aaeb3cdcd155fb8aabbdc17fbeb.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.3 (3.42.3-1.fc35) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 15:50 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Nuno Sá wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 21:19 +0100, Nuno Sá wrote: > > > I would definetly like to have some settlement on the above (before > > sending a v4). It kind of was discussed a bit already in [1] where > > I > > felt we had to live with OF for this driver (that is why I kept OF > > in > > v3. With the above, I cannot > > really see how we can have device API with also including OF... If > > I > > missing something please let me know :) > > Sorry for the delay, answered to your previous message. No worries. As I already said, I'm not doing much till the end of the month but I definetly wanted the device vs OF question settled before starting v4. - Nuno Sá >