From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm,arm64: uniphier: add a new driver, device tree updates Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 01:12:05 +0100 Message-ID: <10682472.c84OiaBWfX@wuerfel> References: <1448357962-12259-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1448357962-12259-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: arm@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 November 2015 18:39:18 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Here is another series for UniPhier SoC family: > > - 1/4: add a new driver. The UniPhier System Bus is an external bus > where on-board devices are connected to the SoC. > (please check if the binding specification is OK.) > > - 2/4: device tree updates to use the driver added by 1/4 > > - 3/4: trivial rename of device node names > > - 4/4: initial commit for ARMv8 SoC/Board device trees > > Please apply 2/4, 3/4/, 4/4 into the same branch because 4/4 depends on 2/4 and 3/4. > (4/4 creates symbolic links to ARM device trees.) I'm a bit confused how this relates to the newer version ("[PATCH v5] bus: uniphier-system-bus: add UniPhier System Bus driver"). The new version only has one patch instead of four, so I'm not sure if the patches 2, 3 and 4 of this series still apply. Can you clarify, or send the entire series again? Arnd