From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>, Shantur Rathore <i@shantur.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dts: rockpro64: Remove usb regulator-always-on
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:29:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10691234.0AQdONaE2F@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABEcMwWEru2DYnd-Y3qWbEp25unVd96TogSnQ+-L+NXKS3_pZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Shantur,
Am Montag, 8. Januar 2024, 13:11:17 CET schrieb Shantur Rathore:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 9:50 AM Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> wrote:
> > On 2024-01-04 10:44, Shantur Rathore wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 10:08 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > >> Am Freitag, 22. Dezember 2023, 15:16:16 CET schrieb Shantur Rathore:
> > >> > USB port regulators should be controlled by PHYs
> > >> > so we remove always-on property and let PHYs manage the
> > >> > regulator.
> > >> >
> > >> > phy-supply isn't sconfugred for the TypeC port and now that we are
> > >> ^^ configured ?
> > >>
> > >> > removing regulator-always-on, we need to fix the phy-supply
> > >> > so the PHYs are able to turn power to type-c port.
> > >> >
> > >> > Series-version: 2
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Shantur Rathore <i@shantur.com>
> > >> > ---
> > >> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi | 3 +--
> > >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> > >> > index bca2b50e0a..f7273f7990 100644
> > >> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> > >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi
> > >> > @@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
> > >> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > >> > pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
> > >> > regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
> > >> > - regulator-always-on;
> > >> > vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_usb>;
> > >> > };
> > >> >
> > >> > @@ -203,7 +202,6 @@ vcc5v0_typec: vcc5v0-typec-regulator {
> > >> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > >> > pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_typec_en>;
> > >> > regulator-name = "vcc5v0_typec";
> > >> > - regulator-always-on;
> > >> > vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_usb>;
> > >> > };
> > >> >
> > >> > @@ -859,6 +857,7 @@ &u2phy0 {
> > >> > status = "okay";
> > >> >
> > >> > u2phy0_otg: otg-port {
> > >> > + phy-supply = <&vcc5v0_typec>;
> > >> > status = "okay";
> > >> > };
> > >>
> > >> Just to explain for me, what is supplying the "other" OTG port
> > >> u2phy1_otg: otg-port {}
> > >>
> > >> in u2phy1 ... this one is status okay, but does not have any phy
> > >> supply?
> > >>
> > > In RockPro64 there is only 1 USB-C OTG port and the other port
> > > is a USB-3.0 port.
> > > To be honest, I am not 100% sure how this all works, as I understand
> > > the USB3.0 port is wired to the second TypeC Phy.
> > >
> > > Maybe Dragan has more info on this.
> >
> > I'll have it checked and tested in detail, of course, but I have to
> > recover from this nasty flu first. Unfortunately, it has rendeded me
> > unable to even think straight.
>
> Hope you feel better soon.
> It would be awesome if we can get this in while the current merge
> window is open.
just a small comment regarding timing. All regular development changes
need to be finished and in linux-next _before_ the merge-window opens.
As this is not a fix it will go to 6.9 anyway - hence no need to rush.
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-08 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-22 14:16 [PATCH v2] dts: rockpro64: Remove usb regulator-always-on Shantur Rathore
2023-12-29 22:08 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-01-04 9:44 ` Shantur Rathore
2024-01-04 9:50 ` Dragan Simic
2024-01-08 12:11 ` Shantur Rathore
2024-01-08 12:29 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-01-08 14:47 ` Dragan Simic
2024-01-21 22:12 ` Shantur Rathore
2024-01-21 22:24 ` Dragan Simic
2024-01-21 22:56 ` Shantur Rathore
2024-01-08 14:40 ` Dragan Simic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10691234.0AQdONaE2F@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=i@shantur.com \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).