From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6CA58135; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706688233; cv=none; b=muBOiFUAw4KTsA3X6K2hvzN0Zo+f5FL58qtvV7fQzShHXgeIm5b27Jj1ZKUkN01/OqlgTVnGUNKoij93AiNJ7Vcv5rAXTLtKYnoK3FJCJUa8byfeaiq1FD3wOQuLxiE9b2aa4if/mxB/jt+Ug38R+TnquRhtauGSXYWKdVevvYE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706688233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SLt6XU8pphgvYoB82n92VjDz497XNVauFggwxunEtzk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=K+TNaIpFBb7tOX0mqIoJsUEK67UgmS6V/k3aLiIT+b5rl0dE45BmUddoJbpeN8+tVpKjCs66YTnNwZ5MHZxCjJbEYtpeLtd61xk5VOo3cyPyD44ocbojTkRbeksNb4bn2PCykMl+9bxegPz3HvFwwvE+M5TZN1VDyDATYElOiIQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Received: from i53875af6.versanet.de ([83.135.90.246] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rV5Yp-0002dS-MR; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:03:07 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Dang Huynh , Manuel Traut Cc: Neil Armstrong , Jessica Zhang , Sam Ravnborg , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sandy Huang , Mark Yao , Diederik de Haas , Segfault , Arnaud Ferraris , Ondrej Jirman , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: rockchip: Pine64 PineTab2 support Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:03:05 +0100 Message-ID: <10956967.nitPUkWRp2@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20240127-pinetab2-v4-0-37aab1c39194@mecka.net> <6035442.lOV4Wx5bFT@melttower> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2024, 20:36:22 CET schrieb Manuel Traut: > Hi Dang, > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 06:35:50PM +0700, Dang Huynh wrote: > > Hi Manuel, > > > > Since the BOE patches have been accepted to next, you do not need to include > > it in this patch series. > > sorry, I thought patches to LKML shall be against Linux master since the > patches are still only in drm-next I considered to keep them in the queue. normally if parts of the v(x-1) version of your series are already applied somewhere you just mention that fact in the cover-letter in the changelog, like "dropped display patches already applied to drm-misc" Just to make sure, there is no need for a resend, I'll look at and pick just the remaining patches :-) Heiko