From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 00/16] clk: exynos4/5: migrate to common clock framework Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:00:09 +0900 Message-ID: <116a01ce24fd$e32658b0$a9730a10$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1361175686-19400-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <20130319184938.8663.18115@quantum> <201303192212.16877.heiko@sntech.de> <20130319215038.8663.83548@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-reply-to: <20130319215038.8663.83548@quantum> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Mike Turquette' , =?utf-8?Q?'Heiko_St=C3=BCbner'?= Cc: 'Thomas Abraham' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, t.figa@samsung.com, sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Mike Turquette wrote: > [...] > > > Thomas, > > > > > > Are you planning a V7 series which includes the clock alias bits from > > > patch #1? > > > > Kukjin has already applied this series into the linux-samsung tree [0]. > > Thanks, Heiko. Mike, yes I did, as we discussed before. Since I missed in last window for v3.9, so I merged every common clock stuff for exynos into samsung tree in the early 3.9-rc time for v3.10. > > That really is too much code to go into drivers/clk without my ACK. I > have not made much noise about this in the past but there has been more > and more "bonus" code slipping into drivers/clk each merge window. > Let's not do that any more. > Hmm, I remember you already agreed on previous version, and I thought if any further codes are required, we could do it on top of that. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/143429.html However, if you don't want current codes to be sent to upstream, let me know, but I don't think it would be better to us though. Thanks. - Kukjin