From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6239433F390 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 19:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783451477; cv=none; b=CBbgTWbmHPALzGLeuIIH+4VFMod1fl+Cu7rzaK5ocwIOJrqNrcBK+GvtZvkbD7hWrXuBo3c7hPVNNa4TlCaHpsuNmUjE7Yyj9UVgOdhpD7Ic/0f6jD13dVRyepPN7uTt2u8CpIhtLeWxZxzwT5/BKnQPXiBFgLbtrEmDr5CKHLQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783451477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CzSD/WRXSlgKfw1SIJ9ztQiHBCfypInUCvizihETDao=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TCYF2yup6/e3T4tPu+BNVlUZsbkKCIa/1BtOtLjVcc3ADCj9JCHFnFbnM7NseE/EGfwaZYhHoXforxUO5XzD+203qMdlpviofdEoTD8akOhsBR8MCEyUV6p1NZPXfIXJUnnktYMEo4uVMLpr73vkvUKT0ZZgfoSCS/I5Qps5jj0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=0tNkP0sM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="0tNkP0sM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=CzSD/WRXSlgKfw1SIJ9ztQiHBCfypInUCvizihETDao=; b=0tNkP0sM9hr4FZjY++IN4eXAym vUXoSgMGph9rYpY5YQiICFxdvkb4gWX5CkBKDtyzVM95S6pBYN3Tg6g4mEHcUCkogYvGpdWjP4bW9 D6xOzbUOg0NJZMg12EspXxOL9FEq0QPcmXEHq5mmSVwRlxEsyiGwE0t985yqwAbAXTlUUv56B1wxg Wko+DbvaIYA0Q07bIRq8H1ArSEHrkXFHBHUm1gLrtWzk8xnSeRU8fE+RJXY5KiqzDyLdHoZJ15+6v FS5nYLb1LZPj45gwqQa9ItRL6q5n1lTyXfUaAhjfu/Mz8dn13ZFXOsi4XTtX8pnUquUUPnHRef3GM E0IQcJVw==; From: Heiko Stuebner To: Diederik de Haas , Joachim Eastwood Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add NanoPi M6 board Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:11:10 +0200 Message-ID: <118899013.nniJfEyVGO@phil> In-Reply-To: References: <20260703-nanopi-m6-v1-0-8344a1559519@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Freitag, 3. Juli 2026, 22:23:32 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit schrie= b Joachim Eastwood: > Hi Diederik, >=20 > On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 at 13:30, Diederik de Haas w= rote: > > > > On Fri Jul 3, 2026 at 12:07 AM CEST, Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay wrot= e: > > > This patch series add support for the NanoPi M6. This board is very > > > similar to the NanoPi R6C and R6S boards which are already supported. > > > > > > Main differences: > > > * M.2 M-key slot with PCIe (Also present on R6C) > > > * M.2 E-key slot with PCIe and USB (from hub) > > > * 1 additional USB 2.0 port from an on-board USB hub > > > * RT5616 audio CODEC > > > > This seems to be the M6 (2405 aka 'V1')? > Yes, correct. This patch set is for the original M6 board. V1 if you like. >=20 > > Because there is now also a M6V2 (2603), which uses an ES8389 CODEC: > > https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=3Dproduct/product&path=3D6= 9&product_id=3D319 > I did notice there was a new version, but I hadn't given it much thought. >=20 > > Is it useful to already take the 2 M6 variants into account with this p= atch set? > Yes, I think you are right. >=20 > How about this setup: > rk3588s-nanopi-m6.dtsi > rk3588s-nanopi-m6v1.dts > rk3588s-nanopi-m6v2.dts > This mimics the setup for the R6 series boards with rk3588s-nanopi-r6.dtsi > and rk3588s-nanopi-r6[cs].dts. yes, that would be the nicest way I think. Thanks for taking this into account Heiko