devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:11:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <128dc42a50bfe166993205108a5b23cd.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422232404.213174-6-sboyd@kernel.org>

Quoting Stephen Boyd (2024-04-22 16:23:58)
> diff --git a/drivers/base/test/platform_kunit.c b/drivers/base/test/platform_kunit.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..54af6db2a6d8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/base/test/platform_kunit.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Test managed platform driver
> + */
> +
[...]
> +
> +/**
> + * platform_driver_register_kunit() - Register a KUnit test managed platform driver
> + * @test: test context
> + * @drv: platform driver to register
> + *
> + * Register a test managed platform driver. This allows callers to embed the
> + * @drv in a container structure and use container_of() in the probe function
> + * to pass information to KUnit tests. It can be assumed that the driver has
> + * probed when this function returns.
> + *
> + * Example
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: c
> + *
> + *     struct kunit_test_context {
> + *             struct platform_driver pdrv;
> + *             const char *data;
> + *     };
> + *
> + *     static inline struct kunit_test_context *
> + *     to_test_context(struct platform_device *pdev)
> + *     {
> + *             return container_of(to_platform_driver(pdev->dev.driver),
> + *                                 struct kunit_test_context,
> + *                                 pdrv);
> + *     }
> + *
> + *     static int kunit_platform_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> + *     {
> + *             struct kunit_test_context *ctx;
> + *
> + *             ctx = to_test_context(pdev);
> + *             ctx->data = "test data";
> + *
> + *             return 0;
> + *     }
> + *
> + *     static void kunit_platform_driver_test(struct kunit *test)
> + *     {
> + *             struct kunit_test_context *ctx;
> + *
> + *             ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + *             KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
> + *
> + *             ctx->pdrv.probe = kunit_platform_driver_probe;
> + *             ctx->pdrv.driver.name = "kunit-platform";
> + *             ctx->pdrv.driver.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + *
> + *             KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, platform_driver_register_kunit(test, &ctx->pdrv));
> + *             KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, ctx->data, "test data");
> + *     }
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on failure.
> + */
> +int platform_driver_register_kunit(struct kunit *test,
> +                                  struct platform_driver *drv)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = platform_driver_register(drv);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Wait for the driver to probe (or at least flush out of the deferred
> +        * workqueue)
> +        */
> +       wait_for_device_probe();

Should this be removed? I was thinking that this isn't a pure wrapper
around platform_driver_register() because it has this wait call.  Maybe
it's better to have some other kunit API that can wait for a specific
device to probe and timeout if it doesn't happen in that amount of time.
That API would use the bus notifiers and look for
BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER. Or maybe that function could setup a completion
that the test can wait on.

> +
> +       return kunit_add_action_or_reset(test,
> +                                        (kunit_action_t *)&platform_driver_unregister,
> +                                        drv);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_driver_register_kunit);

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22 23:23 [PATCH v4 00/10] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2024-04-22 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2024-04-23 15:05   ` Rob Herring
2024-05-01  7:55   ` David Gow
2024-05-03  0:36     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-05-04  8:30       ` David Gow
2024-04-22 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2024-05-01  7:55   ` David Gow
2024-04-22 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2024-05-01  7:55   ` David Gow
2024-05-02 21:23     ` Brendan Higgins
2024-04-22 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-04-23 15:07   ` Rob Herring
2024-04-22 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-04-24 18:11   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2024-04-30 21:32     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-05-01  7:55   ` David Gow
2024-05-03  1:03     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-05-04  8:30       ` David Gow
2024-05-10 20:12         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-05-14  3:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2024-04-22 23:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] dt-bindings: kunit: Add fixed rate clk consumer test Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:02   ` Stephen Boyd
2024-04-22 23:24 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-04-22 23:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2024-04-22 23:24 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] dt-bindings: clk: Add KUnit clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2024-04-22 23:24 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
2024-05-01  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data David Gow
2024-05-03  1:27   ` Stephen Boyd
2024-05-14 21:29     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-05-15 13:06       ` Rob Herring
2024-05-15 21:15         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-05-15 22:08           ` Rob Herring
2024-05-17  0:33             ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=128dc42a50bfe166993205108a5b23cd.sboyd@kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).