Re: [PATCH 01/19] dt-bindings: clock: tegra124-dfll: Update DFLL binding for PWM regulator

[Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>]

On 12/11/18 5:16 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:59:10AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 10/12/2018 08:49, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> Thanks for reviewing this series.
>>>
>>> On 12/7/18 9:41 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 04/12/2018 09:25, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>> From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add new properties to configure the DFLL PWM regulator support. Also
>>>>> add an example and make the I2C clock only required when I2C support is
>>>>> used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    .../bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt   | 73 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git
>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt
>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt
>>>>> index dff236f524a7..8c97600d2bad 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt
>>>>> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ the fast CPU cluster. It consists of a free-running
>>>>> voltage controlled
>>>>>    oscillator connected to the CPU voltage rail (VDD_CPU), and a
>>>>> closed loop
>>>>>    control module that will automatically adjust the VDD_CPU voltage by
>>>>>    communicating with an off-chip PMIC either via an I2C bus or via
>>>>> PWM signals.
>>>>> -Currently only the I2C mode is supported by these bindings.
>>>>>      Required properties:
>>>>>    - compatible : should be "nvidia,tegra124-dfll"
>>>>> @@ -45,10 +44,28 @@ Required properties for the control loop parameters:
>>>>>    Optional properties for the control loop parameters:
>>>>>    - nvidia,cg-scale: Boolean value, see the field
>>>>> DFLL_PARAMS_CG_SCALE in the TRM.
>>>>>    +Optional properties for mode selection:
>>>>> +- nvidia,pwm-to-pmic: Use PWM to control regulator rather then I2C.
>>>>> +
>>>>>    Required properties for I2C mode:
>>>>>    - nvidia,i2c-fs-rate: I2C transfer rate, if using full speed mode.
>>>>>    -Example:
>>>>> +Required properties for PWM mode:
>>>>> +- nvidia,pwm-period: period of PWM square wave in microseconds.
>>>>> +- nvidia,init-uv: Regulator voltage in micro volts when PWM control
>>>>> is disabled.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe consider 'pwm-inactive-voltage-microvolt'.
>>> Ah, I think I need to refine the description here. It should be
>>> something like below.
>>>   - nvidia,pwm-init-microvolt : Regulator voltage in micro volts when PWM
>>> control is initialized
>>>
>>> This is the initial voltage that when we just initialize the DFLL
>>> hardware for PWM output. And before we switch the CPU clock from PLLX to
>>> DFLL, we will enable DFLL hardware in closed loop mode which will aplly
>>> the DVFS table that was calculated from CVB table.
>>>
>>> The original description maybe make you think that it's the working
>>> voltage when it's under open-loop mode. But it's not. Sorry.
>>>
>>> When we working on open-loop mode which will switch to low voltage range
>>> which also follows the DVFS table. Not this one.
>>
>> OK, but I am still not sure what this voltage is. I mean that I
>> understand it is the initial voltage, but how exactly do we define this
>> number? Where does it come from, how is this determined?
>>
> 
> It is set by a resistive divider on the board iirc.

Yes, correct. The previous reply I did was the case of I2C regulator. 
Sorry, I made the confusion here.

> 
>>>>
>>>>> +- nvidia,align-offset-uv: Regulator voltage in micro volts when PWM
>>>>> control is
>>>>> +              enabled and PWM output is low.
>>>>
>>>> Would this be considered the minimum pwm active voltage?
>>> This would be used for minimum voltage for LUT table, which is the table
>>> that PMIC can output. The real minimum voltage in PWM mode still depends
>>> on the CVB table.
>>>
>>> So maybe change this one to 'nvidia,pwm-offset-uv'.
>>
>> So is this the min supported by the PMIC? Maybe the name should reflect
>> that because the above name does not reflect this. Furthermore, if this
>> is a min then maybe the name should use 'min' as opposed to 'offset'.
>> for example, 'nvidia,pwm-pmic-min-microvolts'.
>>
>> Does this need to be described in DT, can it not be queried from the PMIC?
>>
> 
> There is no interface to query anything from the OVR regulator.
> 
> Peter.
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel