From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:03:03 +0100 Message-ID: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil> References: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4970034.fqvMoHdOyd@phil> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel , Mark Rutland Cc: Grant Likely , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip > Cortex-A9 SoCs. So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the m= ore=20 general patches could use an ack. Going forward, what would be best way to merge them? As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the = first=20 three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stu= ff going=20 through arm-soc? Or something else altogether? > Heiko Stuebner (7): > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland . Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wi= shed=20 from Rob? And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the origi= nal=20 thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) . > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also= =20 contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the= pool=20 parts) you asked for. Could I persuade you to take a look again? Thanks Heiko > ARM: rockchip: add snoop-control-unit > ARM: rockchip: add sram dt nodes and documentation > ARM: rockchip: add power-management-unit > ARM: rockchip: add smp bringup code >=20 > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/pmu.txt | 16 ++ > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/smp-sram.txt | 23 +++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt | 8 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3066a.dtsi | 6 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188.dtsi | 6 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3xxx.dtsi | 10 + > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h | 22 +++ > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S | 30 +++ > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c | 208 > ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c = | =20 > 2 + > drivers/misc/sram.c | 121 ++++++++++= +- > drivers/of/base.c | 32 +++ > include/linux/of.h | 76 +++++++ > 15 files changed, 554 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/pm= u.txt > create mode 100644 > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip/smp-sram.txt create mo= de > 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/core.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html