Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3 RESEND] mtd: fsl_upm: Support NAND ECC DTS properties

[Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 2:30:26 AM
> 
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:41:49PM -0600, Aaron Sierra wrote:
> > From: Jordan Friendshuh <jfriendshuh@xes-inc.com>
> > 
> > Support the generic nand-ecc-mode, nand-ecc-strength, and
> > nand-ecc-step-size device-tree properties with the Freescale UPM NAND
> > driver.
> > 
> > This patch preserves the default software ECC mode while adding the
> > ability to use BCH ECC for larger NAND devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Friendshuh <jfriendshuh@xes-inc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >     * Now using ECC mode and strength helpers from of_mtd.h
> >     * ECC mode and strength checking is more robust
> > v3 (resent due to [PATCH 1/2] v2 update):
> >     * Require nand-ecc-step-size for soft_bch.
> >     * Simplify mode/strength/step parameter checking.
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/fsl-upm-nand.txt       | 32 +++++++++++
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig                           |  1 +
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c                         | 66
> >  ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 
> I was thinking about this a bit more, and it seems like we could really
> just factor this all into the core nand_base code with something like
> the following patch. It could possibly use some smarter logic to rule
> out certain combinations (but some of those are already caught in
> nand_scan_tail() anyway). What do you think?

Brian,
If the NAND device tree property fetching were moved out of fsl_upm,
I think it should not be called within nand_scan(). I think that
it's imperative that each driver be able to access these properties
before handing off to nand_scan(), since there are hardware ECC
modes that only drivers will know how to error check.

Also, catching errors in nand_scan_tail() tends to result in BUG()s.

That said, this could be useful as a publicly exported function that
individual drivers are responsible for calling (maybe in of_mtd.c).

I have a couple of additional comments inline below.
 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> index 72755d7ec25d..fc4834946233 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static int fun_chip_init(struct fsl_upm_nand *fun,
>  	flash_np = of_get_next_child(upm_np, NULL);
>  	if (!flash_np)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> +	fun->chip.dn = flash_np;
>  
>  	fun->mtd.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "0x%llx.%s", (u64)io_res->start,
>  				  flash_np->name);
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 3f24b587304f..b701c3f23da1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  #include <linux/leds.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
> +#include <linux/of_mtd.h>
>  
>  /* Define default oob placement schemes for large and small page devices */
>  static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_8 = {
> @@ -3780,6 +3781,33 @@ ident_done:
>  	return type;
>  }
>  
> +static int nand_dt_init(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> +			struct device_node *dn)

Assuming that of_mtd.c is the best place to put this, the
prototype could be simplified a little:

int of_nand_chip_init(struct device_node *dn, struct nand_chip *chip)

> +{
> +	int ecc_mode, ecc_strength, ecc_step;
> +
> +	if (of_get_nand_bus_width(dn) == 16)
> +		chip->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> +
> +	if (of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(dn))
> +		chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
> +
> +	ecc_mode = of_get_nand_ecc_mode(dn);
> +	ecc_strength = of_get_nand_ecc_strength(dn);
> +	ecc_step = of_get_nand_ecc_step_size(dn);
> +
> +	if (ecc_mode >= 0)
> +		chip->ecc.mode = ecc_mode;
> +
> +	if (ecc_strength >= 0)
> +		chip->ecc.strength = ecc_strength;
> +
> +	if (ecc_step > 0)
> +		chip->ecc.size = ecc_step;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * nand_scan_ident - [NAND Interface] Scan for the NAND device
>   * @mtd: MTD device structure
> @@ -3797,6 +3825,13 @@ int nand_scan_ident(struct mtd_info *mtd, int
> maxchips,
>  	int i, nand_maf_id, nand_dev_id;
>  	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
>  	struct nand_flash_dev *type;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (chip->dn) {
> +		ret = nand_dt_init(mtd, chip, chip->dn);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Set the default functions */
>  	nand_set_defaults(chip, chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> index 3d4ea7eb2b68..e0f40e12a2c8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>  
>  struct mtd_info;
>  struct nand_flash_dev;
> +struct device_node;
> +
>  /* Scan and identify a NAND device */
>  extern int nand_scan(struct mtd_info *mtd, int max_chips);
>  /*
> @@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ struct nand_buffers {
>   *			flash device
>   * @IO_ADDR_W:		[BOARDSPECIFIC] address to write the 8 I/O lines of the
>   *			flash device.
> + * @dn:			[BOARDSPECIFIC] device node describing this instance
>   * @read_byte:		[REPLACEABLE] read one byte from the chip
>   * @read_word:		[REPLACEABLE] read one word from the chip
>   * @write_byte:		[REPLACEABLE] write a single byte to the chip on the
> @@ -644,6 +647,8 @@ struct nand_chip {
>  	void __iomem *IO_ADDR_R;
>  	void __iomem *IO_ADDR_W;
>  
> +	struct device_node *dn;
> +

This addition to struct nand_chip wouldn't be needed, then.

>  	uint8_t (*read_byte)(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  	u16 (*read_word)(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>  	void (*write_byte)(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t byte);
> 

You hinted at implementing stronger error checking. If we went
this route, would it make sense to only error check the software
ECC modes?

-Aaron

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/