From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/14] drm/exynos: few patches to enhance bridge chip support Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:37:17 +0200 Message-ID: <13166907.g68bKfaUGl@avalon> References: <1416045309-13359-1-git-send-email-ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> <20150119163043.GB7751@ulmo.nvidia.com> <54BD3943.80402@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54BD3943.80402@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Thierry Reding , Daniel Stone , dri-devel , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Sean Paul , Daniel Vetter , Tomi Valkeinen , Ajay kumar , Kukjin Kim , Pannaga Bhushan Reddy Patel , Prashanth G , Ajay Kumar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Monday 19 January 2015 18:05:07 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 01/19/2015 05:30 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >> I know you probably are very busy but it would be great if you can take a > >> look to this series to avoid another kernel release to be missed since > >> we are already at v3.19-rc5. > >> > >> Only this version was posted 2 months ago and the first version of the > >> series was sent on May, 2014 so it has been on the list for almost a > >> year now... > >> > >> Tomi and Laurent had already agreed with the DT binging so I think that > >> we can already merge these and if there are any remaining issues, those > >> can be fixed during the 3.20 -rc cycle. > > > > I see only a single Tested-by on this series and that seems to be with a > > bunch of out-of-tree patches applied on top. Does this now actually work > > applied on top of upstream? Also it seems like many people actually want > > this to get merged but there's been no Reviewed-bys and only a single > > Tested-by? Is that as good as it's going to get? > > Good point, I provided some feedback on an early version of the series but > I'm not an DRM expert so I couldn't review it in detail to provide my > Reviewed-by. > > I did provide my Tested-by a long time ago though but looking at the patches > it seems those were dropped so here goes again: > > For the whole series on an Exynos5420 Peach Pit and an Exynos5250 Snow > Chromebooks: > > Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > > Also I think the last update was that Ajay was going to resend this > > based on v3.19-rc1 or something. Is that still going to happen? > > Otherwise I can probably try to apply as-is, but not sure how well it > > will. > > Ajay, > > Are you going to rebase and resend this series with all the provided tags? > Gustavo and I have a rebased branch on top of 3.19-rc5 and one of us can > post your series if you are not planning to do it. > > Laurent and Tomi, > > You said that you are OK with the DT bindings now, does that count as an > Acked-by or Reviewed-by for you at least for the DT bindings changes in the > series? It counts as an Acked-by for the DT bindings. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart