From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] ARM: topology: Add arch_scale_freq_power function Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:30:57 -0700 Message-ID: <1339615857.28729.6.camel@joe2Laptop> References: <1339502524-10265-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1339502524-10265-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1339591969.8980.30.camel@twins> <20120613192740.GZ5878@dm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120613192740.GZ5878@dm> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rob.herring@calxeda.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 20:27 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 14:02 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > } > > > smp_wmb(); > > > } > > > > You know what.. we should make checkpatch report an error for memory > > barriers that don't have a comment. > > > > I know this isn't added by this patch, but every time I see something > > like it I cry a little. > > Actually if it was a new line, it would have been reported, at least in > theory: > > # check for memory barriers without a comment. > if ($line =~ > /\b(mb|rmb|wmb|read_barrier_depends|smp_mb|smp_rmb|smp_wmb|smp_read_barrier_depends)\(/) > { > if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { > CHK("MEMORY_BARRIER", > "memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr); > } > } Maybe promote that CHK to a WARN.