From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] ARM: topology: Add arch_scale_freq_power function Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:51:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1339624281.8980.73.camel@twins> References: <1339502524-10265-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1339502524-10265-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1339591969.8980.30.camel@twins> <20120613192740.GZ5878@dm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120613192740.GZ5878@dm> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: Vincent Guittot , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rob.herring@calxeda.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 20:27 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Actually if it was a new line, it would have been reported, at least in > theory: > > # check for memory barriers without a comment. > if ($line =~ > /\b(mb|rmb|wmb|read_barrier_depends|smp_mb|smp_rmb|smp_wmb|smp_read_barrier_depends)\(/) > { > if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { > CHK("MEMORY_BARRIER", > "memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr); > } > } Oh sweet, we already have something for that.. But yeah I'd promote that CHK to something stronger like Joe said. Maybe even error. Memory barriers are magic, not adding proper comments should be a capital offense.