From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: reform prom_update_property function Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:39:17 +1000 Message-ID: <1340343557.16104.35.camel@pasglop> References: <1340171647-2815-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <4FE1CB2C.5040208@gmail.com> <1340237796.28143.207.camel@pasglop> <20120621093702.GE21231@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net> <1340323284.16104.4.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Dong Aisheng Cc: Dong Aisheng , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Paul Mackerras List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 13:25 +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > Which seems the same behavior as the new prop_update_property api. > The only different is if no name, return -EINVAL; > Am i wrong? No, you are right. Sorry for the noise :-) Cheers, Ben.