devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Stefan Roese <sr-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Holger Brunck
	<holger.brunck-SkAbAL50j+5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-discuss-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Support Persistent Protection Bits (PPB) locking
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:25:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355325915.3400.8.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C62CBA.5040401-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1863 bytes --]

On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 19:40 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 04:00 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 08:22 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * Wait for some time as unlocking of all sectors takes quite long
> >> +        */
> >> +       timeo = jiffies + (2 * HZ);     /* 2s max (un)locking */
> > 
> > Please, use msecs_to_jiffies() instead.
> 
> Sure, thats better.

Would you please do this instead?

> AFAIK, chip->mutex protects the access to the chip itself. So that
> sequences are not interrupted.
> 
> I have to admit that I haven't looked into get_chip() so far. It seems
> to handle a state machine. Normally (idle state) it will just fall
> through (FL_READY).

So it looks like the idea is that you first take the mutex, then call
get_chip() which will wait for the chip becoming really ready, and then
you can safely use it.

> 
> > Why you need to drop the mutex here?
> 
> Not sure, that might not be necessary. Copy and past from another loop
> in the same file.

Probably from 'get_chip()' ?

> > Why is it not an ABBA deadlock to do this:
> > 
> > Task 1: In the loop above, has chip locked, doing
> >         mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
> > 
> > Task 2: done mutex_lock(&chip->mutex), now doing
> >         ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr + chip->start, FL_LOCKING);
> 
> I don't see two different locks/mutexes (only A) here. As get_chip()
> does no request any real mutex. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Right, there is indeed no deadlock.

> In many other places UDELAY() is called:
> 
> #define UDELAY(map, chip, adr, usec)  \
> do {  \
> 	mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);  \
> 	cfi_udelay(usec);  \
> 	mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);  \
> } while (0)

Why not to use this as well then for consistency?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07  7:22 [PATCH] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Support Persistent Protection Bits (PPB) locking Stefan Roese
2012-12-07 10:41 ` Holger Brunck
     [not found] ` <1354864954-30290-1-git-send-email-sr-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-10 15:00   ` Artem Bityutskiy
     [not found]     ` <1355151644.2657.41.camel-Bxnoe/o8FG+Ef9UqXRslZEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-10 18:40       ` Stefan Roese
     [not found]         ` <50C62CBA.5040401-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-12 15:25           ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
     [not found]             ` <1355325915.3400.8.camel-Bxnoe/o8FG+Ef9UqXRslZEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-12 15:44               ` Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1355325915.3400.8.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
    --to=dedekind1-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=holger.brunck-SkAbAL50j+5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sr-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).