From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joem Subject: Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)) Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:49:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1370616567.2433.20.camel@jm-desktop> References: <51AFA6DD.3000202@wwwdotorg.org> <1370469574.18839.33.camel@localhost> <1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost> <1370477958.20454.68.camel@localhost> <51B085C6.3000605@gmail.com> <51B19046.5040401@gmail.com> Reply-To: Linux on small ARM machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: arm-netbook-bounces@lists.phcomp.co.uk Sender: "arm-netbook" To: Linux on small ARM machines Cc: "debian-arm@lists.debian.org" , devicetree-discuss , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ARM Linux Mailing List , "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > SoC vendors are free to join the discussion, and many SoC vendors are part > > of the kernel community, so calling this unilateral is plain wrong. > > you're free to believe that, vladimir. i've explained why that > hasn't happened, in prior messages. can we move forward, please? I prefer it if the "vladimir" troll (and fellow trolls) make requests for one of us to make or do something instead of constantly whining and wasting time. After all we are attached to funds and resources ready to deploy if something sounds a good idea and gets a vote. To vladimir - please put your thoughts in a blog where it belongs. If its important, I'm sure others would offer comment and take you up on your thoughts.