From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] DMA: Freescale: Add new 8-channel DMA engine device tree nodes Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:12:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1373908337.8183.301@snotra> References: <1373005626-20726-1-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@freescale.com> <1373005626-20726-2-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@freescale.com> <6482CAC0-9C6A-4A1E-B158-28D2E1BB2CCE@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6482CAC0-9C6A-4A1E-B158-28D2E1BB2CCE@kernel.crashing.org> (from galak@kernel.crashing.org on Mon Jul 15 08:35:07 2013) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kumar Gala Cc: "" , vinod.koul@intel.com, djbw@fb.com, leoli@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vakul@freescale.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/15/2013 08:35:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2013, at 1:27 AM, > wrote: > > > +dma0: dma@100300 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + compatible = "fsl,elo3-dma"; > > why does this require a new compatible? The binding has changed -- there is now a second reg entry. -Scott