From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] reset: Add driver for gpio-controlled reset pins Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:51:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1373968279.4327.13.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de> References: <1369904940-716-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20130716015038.GD28375@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20130716065130.GB30067@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130716065130.GB30067-rvtDTF3kK1ictlrPMvKcciBecyulp+rMXqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Shawn Guo Cc: Marek Vasut , Fabio Estevam , Mike Turquette , Len Brown , Sascha Hauer , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Roger Quadros List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2013, 14:51 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:50:42AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:09:00AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > This driver implements a reset controller device that toggle a gpio > > > connected to a reset pin of a peripheral IC. The delay between assertion > > > and de-assertion of the reset signal can be configured via device tree. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel > > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren > > > > I see this patch is very useful, as GPIOs are widely used to reset > > components/devices on board. But I do not find the patch in v3.11-rc1. > > What's your plan about it? > > > > Also, I'm wondering if we should register the driver a little bit > > early. Please see the following patch. If it makes sense to you, > > I can send the patch to you, or you can just quash it into yours. > > And here is another change request. Looks good to me. I can squash it into the original patch and resend if you like. regards Philipp > Shawn > > ----8<--------------- > > From 822a0c4fb7c99b371844ba7e957affcaa8cb1cfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Shawn Guo > Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:28:05 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] ENGR00269945: reset: handle cansleep case in gpio-reset > > Some gpio reset may be backed by a gpio that can sleep, e.g. pca953x > gpio output. For such gpio, gpio_set_value_cansleep() should be > called. Otherwise, the WARN_ON(chip->can_sleep) in gpiod_set_value() > will be hit. Add a gpio_cansleep() check to handle cansleep gpio. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > --- > drivers/reset/gpio-reset.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/gpio-reset.c b/drivers/reset/gpio-reset.c > index 5d2515a..4f372f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/reset/gpio-reset.c > +++ b/drivers/reset/gpio-reset.c > @@ -32,7 +32,10 @@ static void gpio_reset_set(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, int asserted) > if (drvdata->active_low) > value = !value; > > - gpio_set_value(drvdata->gpio, value); > + if (gpio_cansleep(drvdata->gpio)) > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(drvdata->gpio, value); > + else > + gpio_set_value(drvdata->gpio, value); > } > > static int gpio_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)