From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [dtc RFC PATCH] Enforce node name unit-address presence/absence Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:10:53 +1000 Message-ID: <1379574653.6148.62.camel@pasglop> References: <1379535836-12726-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Stephen Warren , Jon Loeliger , David Gibson , Frank Rowand , Tomasz Figa , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Marek Szyprowski , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Stephen Warren List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 13:41 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > Also, maybe warn for @0x, which is another unpreferred syntax, it > should just be @ (with foo being in hex). It can also bee @foo,bar, it doesn *have* to match the exact content of the reg property first entry. In fact it's not uncommon to use a 64-bit value here on 64-bit processors and pci uses a different encoding scheme (on real OFW at least) where they typically do @dev,fn Yes, the fact that the unit address is not something deterministic is and has always been a major PITA though. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html