From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kobjectify device tree structures
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:46:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384537604-5032-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> (raw)
Hi all,
I've resurrected this series and am posting it for review. I think I've
got the last problem that I know about solved. That was the problem that
Nathan pointed out that modified properties don't get reflected in the
sysfs representation. As I mentioned the last time I posted this series,
I will probably put a kernel release between patches 1&2 and patch 3 so
that if there is any problems then the old /proc method is still
available.
I'm posting this for review, but I've only compile tested on ARM and
PowerPC, and boot tested on ARM. I'll be going though a full set of
builds when I'm no longer on an airplane. :-)
The existing device-tree userspace ABI remains the same with this series
applied.
Nathan, I would particularly appreciate if you can test this on PowerPC
machines with OF_DYNAMIC.
g.
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 17:46 Grant Likely [this message]
[not found] ` <1384537604-5032-1-git-send-email-grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-15 17:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] of: Make device nodes kobjects so they show up in sysfs Grant Likely
2013-11-15 17:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] of/selftest: Add self tests for manipulation of properties Grant Likely
[not found] ` <1384537604-5032-3-git-send-email-grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-16 17:50 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2013-11-16 19:09 ` Rob Herring
2013-11-15 17:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] of: remove /proc/device-tree Grant Likely
[not found] ` < 1384537604-5032-3-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org>
[not found] ` < CAL_JsqK-ejMmc36OzSLi=odHkVPv_717b4sZyuJkj=UFVxsx0g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqK-ejMmc36OzSLi=odHkVPv_717b4sZyuJkj=UFVxsx0g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-17 22:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] of/selftest: Add self tests for manipulation of properties Grant Likely
[not found] ` < 902D15D9-439C-43BC-BD27-94785DA2F486@antoniou-consulting.com>
[not found] ` <902D15D9-439C-43BC-BD27-94785DA2F486-wVdstyuyKrO8r51toPun2/C9HSW9iNxf@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-17 22:14 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1384537604-5032-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org \
--to=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).