From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7] dmaengine: Add support for BCM2835
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 08:02:03 -0800
Message-ID: <1384704123.2727.8.camel@joe-AO722>
References: <5288E327.8050809@koalo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <5288E327.8050809-oZ8rN/sblLk@public.gmane.org>
Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Florian Meier <florian.meier-oZ8rN/sblLk@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>, devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>, dmaengine <dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 16:39 +0100, Florian Meier wrote:
> Add support for DMA controller of BCM2835 as used in the Raspberry Pi.
> Currently it only supports cyclic DMA.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c b/drivers/dma/bcm2835-dma.c
[]
> +static int bcm2835_dma_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
> +	unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct bcm2835_chan *c = to_bcm2835_dma_chan(chan);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (cmd) {
> +	case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
> +		return bcm2835_dma_slave_config(c,
> +				(struct dma_slave_config *)arg);
> +
> +	case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
> +		bcm2835_dma_terminate_all(c);
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL returns an uninitialized ret;

[]

> +static struct dma_chan *bcm2835_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *spec,
> +					   struct of_dma *ofdma)
> +{
> +	struct bcm2835_dmadev *d = ofdma->of_dma_data;
> +	struct dma_chan *chan, *candidate;
> +
> +retry:
> +	candidate = NULL;
> +
> +	/* Walk the list of channels registered with the current instance and
> +	 * find one that is currently unused */
> +	list_for_each_entry(chan, &d->ddev.channels, device_node)
> +		if (chan->client_count == 0) {
> +			candidate = chan;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +	if (!candidate)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	/* dma_get_slave_channel will return NULL if we lost a race between
> +	 * the lookup and the reservation */
> +	chan = dma_get_slave_channel(candidate);

Can that race happen consistently?
Does this avoid being a tight loop?

> +	if (chan) {
> +		struct bcm2835_chan *c = to_bcm2835_dma_chan(chan);
> +
> +		/* Set DREQ from param */
> +		c->dreq = spec->args[0];
> +
> +		return chan;
> +	}
> +
> +	goto retry;
> +}

Also, I think this would be better as:

	if (!chan)
		goto retry;

	to_bcm2835_dma_chan(chan)->dreq = spec->args[0];

	return chan;
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html