From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ohci-/ehci-platform: Change compatible string to generic-?hci Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:35:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1392136529-5060-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Roger Quadros , Alan Stern , Tony Prisk , Florian Fainelli , Maxime Ripard , Arnd Bergmann , linux-usb , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, And here is v2 of my ohci-/ehci-platform fixes for the regression of USB support on various ARM boards I caused in linux-next. As expected some people still did not like the ?hci-platform compatible string I went for in v1, hence this v2. The good news is it seems everyone seems to be able to live with generic-?hci as compatible now, so it seems this issue is finally settled. Please add these 2 patches to your usb-next tree, as said in the cover-letter of v1, I'm fine with you squashing these into the first 2 patches of my original series, but if you want them separate to preserve history that is fine too. Thanks & Regards, Hans