Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for Freescale i.MX GPC

[Philipp Zabel <p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Arnd,

[adding Samsung guys into the loop]

Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Tuesday 18 February 2014 16:34:41 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > +
> > +Example of a device that is part of a power domain:
> > +
> > +       vpu: vpu@02040000 {
> > +               reg = <0x02040000 0x3c000>;
> > +               /* ... */
> > +               fsl,power-domain = <&pd_pu>;
> > +               /* ... */
> > +       };
> > +
> 
> I'm really not too happy about platforms starting to add random
> bindings for power domains. Unfortunately I didn't catch exynos
> doing this first, but I don't want to see another platform like
> that.
> 
> Can we please come up with a proper generic power domain binding
> first and then add platform specific users?

what is the process here? I've seen the samsung bindings and copied the
pattern. I guess the Exynos bindings are set in stone, and the i.MX
power domains can be handled using the same bindings.

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html