From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] imx-drm: imx-tve: Fix DDC I2C bus property Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:32:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1394112723.3622.7.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> References: <1394011262-16849-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <1394011262-16849-7-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20140306130320.GA21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140306130320.GA21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Greg Kroah-Hartman , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Grant Likely , Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Russell, Am Donnerstag, den 06.03.2014, 13:03 +0000 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:20:57AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > This patch fixes the TV Encoder DDC I2C bus property to use the common > > 'ddc-i2c-bus' property name instead of 'ddc'. > > Looking at both hdmi and tve, the ddc part is very similar. The difference > is how the probe is handled: > > imx-hdmi: > ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ddc", 0); > if (ddc_node) { > hdmi->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node); > if (!hdmi->ddc) > dev_dbg(hdmi->dev, "failed to read ddc node\n"); > > of_node_put(ddc_node); > } else { > dev_dbg(hdmi->dev, "no ddc property found\n"); > } > > imx-tve: > ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ddc", 0); > if (ddc_node) { > tve->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node); > of_node_put(ddc_node); > } panel-simple.c ddc = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ddc-i2c-bus", 0); if (ddc) { panel->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc); of_node_put(ddc); if (!panel->ddc) { err = -EPROBE_DEFER; goto free_backlight; } } >It appears to differ only by debug prints - is there any reason we > couldn't unify the DDC backend part? I've tinkered with this idea, > and already have a patch, though it needs a little rework. > > Any thoughts? there should be a generic helper for obtaining the DDC I2C adapter from the device tree. I'd prefer not to stall the imx-drm-dt series on this, though. regards Philipp