From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: MSM8974: Add pinctrl node
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:46:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1396964805.28420.53.camel@iivanov-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5343EC87.700@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 07:33 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> >> >I'm confused by this. Isn't this information already defined in the
> >> >pinctrl-msm8x74.c driver?
> >> >
> >> >static const char * const blsp_spi8_groups[] = {
> >> > "gpio45", "gpio46", "gpio47", "gpio48"
> >> >};
> > I am not sure that I understand the question. This is one of
> > possible ways to describe relationship between pins and functions.
> > As they are described is visible what is their real purpose.
>
> Ok, let me rephrase.
>
> The 8x74 pinctrl driver already contains this information. It already
> defines a "blsp_spi8" group consisting of GPIOs 45, 46, 47, and 48.
>
> This patch adds that same exact information into the device tree. Why
> are we duplicating that information? Why add it to the device tree when
> it's already in the driver (and already working).
Probably. It was my natural way of thinking. Pin have a functions.
It is easier if I measure signals to just look at the device
tree file. What are you suggesting?
>
> Also, I don't see any code anywhere that uses these new device tree nodes.
This is easy to fix :-).
Regards,
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1391700529-11816-1-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com>
2014-02-06 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: MSM8974: Add pinctrl node Ivan T. Ivanov
2014-02-10 18:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2014-02-11 20:28 ` Kumar Gala
[not found] ` <1391700529-11816-2-git-send-email-iivanov-NEYub+7Iv8PQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-24 9:57 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-25 15:50 ` Kumar Gala
2014-04-07 23:53 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-08 12:14 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2014-04-08 12:33 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-08 13:46 ` Ivan T. Ivanov [this message]
2014-04-08 14:18 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-08 15:26 ` Timur Tabi
2014-04-08 18:39 ` Bjorn Andersson
2014-04-10 16:22 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-08 12:12 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1396964805.28420.53.camel@iivanov-dev \
--to=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).