From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucas Stach Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] i.MX6 PCIe binding change and MSI support Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1399885183.5016.4.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> References: <1396025579-14344-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <20140424175844.GD29593@google.com> <1398421265.4657.25.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> <1398774686.4677.12.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1398774686.4677.12.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Shawn Guo , Richard Zhu , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Marek Vasut , Arnd Bergmann , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Tim Harvey , Jingoo Han , Rob Herring , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Mark Rutland , Sean Cross , linux-arm List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, just a friendly reminder. It would be nice if you could pull those in. Shawn already pulled the DT change and as it is a binding change this means PCIe on i.MX6 is broken in -next, as long as the remaining patches are missing. Regards, Lucas Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2014, 14:31 +0200 schrieb Lucas Stach: > Hi Bjorn, > > Am Freitag, den 25.04.2014, 08:39 -0600 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas: > [...] > > >> > PCI: designware: split Exynos and i.MX bindings > > >> > ARM: dts: imx6: update pcie to bring in line with new binding > > >> > PCI: imx6: use new clock names > > >> > PCI: imx6: drop old irq mapping > > >> > PCI: imx6: rip out optional (and unused) irqs > > >> > PCI: designware: make MSI isr shared irq aware > > >> > PCI: imx6: add support for MSI > > >> > > >> What's the status of all these? I would normally apply patches 4-8 of this > > >> series through my tree, given the appropriate acks, but I haven't seen > > >> those yet. And I'm not sure what dependencies there are between the > > >> non-PCI patches and the PCI ones. > > >> > > > It's a complete binding change, so applying one part without the other > > > is going to horribly break things. > > > > > > So I would at least want to see an ack for the binding change on the > > > i.MX side from Shawn and Richard. This will need some follow on patches, > > > as some boards adding PCIe using the old binding have cropped up in > > > linux-next, but I can do the patches on short notice if everyone agrees > > > to merge this patchset. > > > > > > The designware part is pretty simple and doesn't change anything for > > > other users than i.MX. Though I would like to see an ack from Jingoo for > > > those. > > > > > > I have some more stuff in the pipes regarding multiple MSI irqs, that > > > depend on this series and also the Keystone people are waiting for this > > > to be applied in order to consolidate the clock handling of the > > > designware core driver, so it would be nice to get this moving again. > > > > OK, just poke me again when you're ready for me to do something with these. > > > > As both Richard and Jingoo gave their ack for the respective patches I > think this is good to go in and I would expect all the PCI patches to go > through your tree for 3.16. > > Shawn, if you are not okay with this change, please speak up now. > Otherwise please pick the dts change for 3.16. I'll go over linux-next > and prepare the patches to fix up the boards there. > -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |