Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: convert to YAML

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 16/05/2022 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Mon May 9, 2022 at 10:40 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/05/2022 10:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 03/01/2022 08:43, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> Convert the PDC interrupt controller bindings to YAML.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> * Adjust description of second reg-name as suggested by Maulik Shah
>>>>
>>>> @Rob Herring: Hope it's ok to keep your R-b given the above changes
>>>>
>>>> This patch depends on the following patch, which fixed sm8250 & sm8350
>>>> compatibles and adds sm6350.
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211213082614.22651-4-luca.weiss@fairphone.com/
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Luca,
>>> I think this needs resending as dependency was merged. Alternatively,
>>> maybe Bjorn could pick it up through QCom SoC?
>>
>> Correction - it seems that Rob took the dependency in April, so this
>> should go via Rob's tree as well.
>>
>> Luca, can you resend without Rob's Review tag and ask him to pick it up?
>>
> 
> So... since torvalds/master my sm6350 patch is merged through Rob's

If it was merged to torvalds/master, it's not a dependency anymore...

> tree, but there was also a sm8150 patch applied through Linus Walleij's
> tree. This means (as far as I understand) that neither can really
> properly apply this (rebased) patch as one tree will have missed the
> other commit.

sm8150 patch is also a dependency?

> 
> Does it make sense to send a v3 rebased on linux-next now, or wait until
> this has settled down in torvalds's tree?

Conflicts can be resolved, you just need to choose one tree to based on.


Best regards,
Krzysztof