Re: 回覆: [PATCH v1 2/2] irqchip/aspeed-intc: Add support for 10 INTC interrupts on AST27XX platforms

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 13/08/2024 11:44, Kevin Chen wrote:
> Hi Krzk,
> 
> In ASPEED, ast2400/2500/2600 use arm architecture with KCONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED which slect MACH_ASPEED_G4/G5/G6 in arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig.
> In the fureture, there would be ast2800/2900/... using arm64. We need to clarify the IC generation between 7th/8th/9th/....
> 
> Maybe change ARCH_ASPEED/MACH_ASPEEDG7 to ARCH_ASPEED first.
> Or, do you have better Kconfig usage?

Fix your quotes and do not top-post.

Please respond inline, instead of top-posting, because it makes your
emails hard to follow.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc7/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L340

> 
> 
>> +config ARCH_ASPEED
>> +     bool "Aspeed SoC family"
>> +     select MACH_ASPEED_G7
>> +     help
>> +       Say yes if you intend to run on an Aspeed ast2700 or similar
>> +       seventh generation Aspeed BMCs.
>> +
>> +config MACH_ASPEED_G7
>> +     bool "Aspeed SoC AST2700"
> 
> There are no MACHines for arm64. Look at this code. Do you see MACH
> anywhere else? No. Then why Aspeed must be different?

What is this?

> 
> --
> Best Regards,
> Kevin. Chen
> 
> ________________________________
> 寄件者: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> 寄件日期: 2024年8月13日 下午 04:50
> 收件者: Kevin Chen <kevin_chen@aspeedtech.com>; tglx@linutronix.de <tglx@linutronix.de>; robh@kernel.org <robh@kernel.org>; krzk+dt@kernel.org <krzk+dt@kernel.org>; conor+dt@kernel.org <conor+dt@kernel.org>; joel@jms.id.au <joel@jms.id.au>; andrew@codeconstruct.com.au <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>
> 主旨: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] irqchip/aspeed-intc: Add support for 10 INTC interrupts on AST27XX platforms
> 

...

>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
>> index 15635812b2d6..d2fe686ae018 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_SEI)                     += irq-mvebu-sei.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_LS_EXTIRQ)                      += irq-ls-extirq.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI)            += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED)            += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_ASPEED_G7)         += irq-aspeed-intc.o
> 
> There is no such thing as CONFIG_MACH_ASPEED_G7. And there will never be.
> 
> You already received feedback on this, so why do you keep pushing your
> solution? You did not respond to any feedback given, just send the same
> and the same till we agree?
> 
> NAK.

And this?

> 
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32MP_EXTI)           += irq-stm32mp-exti.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_EXTI)              += irq-stm32-exti.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER)              += qcom-irq-combiner.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-intc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..71407475fb27
> 

...

> 
> ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ********************
> 免責聲明:
> 本信件(或其附件)可能包含機密資訊，並受法律保護。如 台端非指定之收件者，請以電子郵件通知本電子郵件之發送者, 並請立即刪除本電子郵件及其附件和銷毀所有複印件。謝謝您的合作!
> 
> DISCLAIMER:
> This message (and any attachments) may contain legally privileged and/or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete the e-mail and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.

Maybe I am the intended recipient of your message, maybe not. I don't
want to have any legal questions regarding upstream, public
collaboration, thus probably I should just remove your messages.

Please talk with your IT that such disclaimers in open-source are not
desired (and maybe even harmful).
If you do not understand why, please also see:
https://www.youtube.com/live/fMeH7wqOwXA?si=GY7igfbda6vnjXlJ&t=835

If you need to go around company SMTP server, then consider using b4
web-relay: https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/contributor/send.html

Please be informed that by responding to this email you agree that all
communications from you and/or your company is made public. In other
words, all messages originating from you and/or your company will be
made public.

You already received exactly this feedback. Around three times. If you
keep ignoring feedback, I will keep NAKing your patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof