From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH] of: return -ENOSYS instead of -EINVAL in stub implementations
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1401301204-12834-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Currently the stub implementation(when !CONFIG_OF) of few of_* helpers
return -EINVAL. This makes it difficult to distinguish between the
function not being implemented and the function returning error due to
invalid parameters.
This patch replaces -EINVAL with -ENOSYS in the stub implementations
of those of_* helpers.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/of_address.h | 2 +-
include/linux/of_iommu.h | 2 +-
include/linux/of_irq.h | 2 +-
include/linux/of_pci.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hi,
This was identified on one of the patch review on LKML[1].
Looking into the of_* helpers revealed few such instances.
Regards,
Sudeep
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/21/152
diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h
index 5f6ed6b..d442cda 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_address.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_address.h
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *node, int index);
static inline int of_address_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int index,
struct resource *r)
{
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *device, int index)
diff --git a/include/linux/of_iommu.h b/include/linux/of_iommu.h
index 51a560f..a5f257e 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_iommu.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static inline int of_get_dma_window(struct device_node *dn, const char *prefix,
int index, unsigned long *busno, dma_addr_t *addr,
size_t *size)
{
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_OF_IOMMU */
diff --git a/include/linux/of_irq.h b/include/linux/of_irq.h
index 6404253..0c5945c 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_irq.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ extern int of_irq_parse_oldworld(struct device_node *device, int index,
static inline int of_irq_parse_oldworld(struct device_node *device, int index,
struct of_phandle_args *out_irq)
{
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC32 && CONFIG_PPC_PMAC */
diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h
index 1a1f5ff..15b8307 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int of_pci_msi_chip_add(struct msi_chip *chip);
void of_pci_msi_chip_remove(struct msi_chip *chip);
struct msi_chip *of_pci_find_msi_chip_by_node(struct device_node *of_node);
#else
-static inline int of_pci_msi_chip_add(struct msi_chip *chip) { return -EINVAL; }
+static inline int of_pci_msi_chip_add(struct msi_chip *chip) { return -ENOSYS; }
static inline void of_pci_msi_chip_remove(struct msi_chip *chip) { }
static inline struct msi_chip *
of_pci_find_msi_chip_by_node(struct device_node *of_node) { return NULL; }
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 18:20 Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-05-28 18:45 ` [PATCH] of: return -ENOSYS instead of -EINVAL in stub implementations Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1401301204-12834-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).