From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: [PATCH resend v3 0/2] mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:07:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1404119245-5839-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Chris Ball , Ulf Hansson , Mike Turquette Cc: Arend van Spriel , Maxime Ripard , Sascha Hauer , linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi All, Here is a resend of 3 of my submission of Sascha Hauer's "mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch. Can we please get some movement on these patches, either a review specifying why this cannot go upstream, or else queuing it up for next / 3.17 ? Changes since v1: - Submit as a stand-alone patch-set, rather then as part of a larger oob irq support patchset crossing multiple subsystems - Add a patch to document the already existing practice of using slot subnodes - Split of the dt bindings documentation for sdio-func child nodes into its own patch - Add a preparation patch, setting slot_no where relevant - And finally the "Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing" patch itself has been modified to look for the sdio function childnodes under a slot node instead of directly under the host node Changes since v2: - Drop the slot subnodes again, and drop the 2 slot subnodes patches Regards, Hans