From: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@codeaurora.org>
To: grant.likely@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
stepanm@codeaurora.org
Subject: [PATCH] of: Deep-copy names of platform devices
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:57:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407891444-7311-1-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> (raw)
When we parse the device tree and allocate platform
devices, the 'name' of the newly-created platform_device
is set to point to the 'name' field of the 'struct device'
embedded within the platform_device. This is dangerous,
because the name of the 'struct device' is dynamically
allocated. Drivers may call dev_set_name() on the device,
which will free and reallocate the name of the device,
leaving the 'name' of the platform_device pointing to the
now-freed memory.
Furthermore, if the dev_set_name() call is made from a
driver's probe() function and a subsequent request results
in probe deferral, the dangling 'name' reference may lead
to the device being re-probed using the wrong driver.
To mitigate these scenarios, we use kstrdup to perform a
deep copy of the device name when assigning the name of the
platform_device, so that the platform_device name is
unaffected by any calls to dev_set_name() that might made
by drivers to rename the embedded 'struct device'.
Signed-off-by: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@codeaurora.org>
---
This is technically a 'v2' patch, but it looks like I used
an old version of MAINTAINERS, so I'll just re-send this
as a new patch to avoid confusion for people who missed the
original.
I suppose creating a 'pdev_set_name' API may seem like
another possibility, but I feel that dev.name and pdev.name
have two different meanings. One is used for device/driver
binding purposes, whereas the other serves a more general
identification purpose, and is used for things like sysfs.
Drivers might want to change dev.name while leaving the
pdev.name alone. I guess yet another possibility would be
to prohibit calling dev_set_name() on devices created from
device tree, but a driver does not necessarily know how a
given platform_device was allocated.
Steve
drivers/of/device.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
index f685e55..3e116f6 100644
--- a/drivers/of/device.c
+++ b/drivers/of/device.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int of_device_add(struct platform_device *ofdev)
/* name and id have to be set so that the platform bus doesn't get
* confused on matching */
- ofdev->name = dev_name(&ofdev->dev);
+ ofdev->name = kstrdup(dev_name(&ofdev->dev), GFP_KERNEL);
ofdev->id = -1;
/* device_add will assume that this device is on the same node as
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_device_register);
void of_device_unregister(struct platform_device *ofdev)
{
device_unregister(&ofdev->dev);
+ kfree(ofdev->name);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_device_unregister);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 0:57 Stepan Moskovchenko [this message]
2014-08-13 1:46 ` [PATCH] of: Deep-copy names of platform devices Stephen Boyd
2014-08-13 2:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Stepan Moskovchenko
2014-08-15 16:38 ` Rob Herring
2014-08-16 4:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-08-16 18:29 ` Grant Likely
2014-08-15 10:45 ` [PATCH] " Grant Likely
2014-08-15 10:52 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <CACxGe6tr_hX+XBD=C+y55OixrweVLZvNNFQHxSDHwuHbSYW-XQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-15 11:01 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1407891444-7311-1-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org \
--to=stepanm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).