From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: olof@lixom.net
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify the physical timer
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:00:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410454801-14231-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> (raw)
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
* The firmware isn't involved in SMP bringup or resume.
* The ARCH timer come up with an uninitialized offset between the
virtual and physical counters. Each core gets a different random
offset.
* The device boots in "Secure SVC" mode.
* Nothing has touched the reset value of CNTHCTL.PL1PCEN or
CNTHCTL.PL1PCTEN (both default to 1 at reset)
On systems like the above, it doesn't make sense to use the virtual
counter. There's nobody managing the offset and each time a core goes
down and comes back up it will get reinitialized to some other random
value.
Let's add a property to the device tree to say that we shouldn't use
the virtual timer. Firmware could potentially remove this property
before passing the device tree to the kernel if it really wants the
kernel to use a virtual timer.
Note that it's been said that ARM64 (ARMv8) systems the firmware and
kernel really can't be architected as described above. That means
using the physical timer like this really only makes sense for ARMv7
systems.
In order for this patch to do anything useful, we also need Sonny's
patch at <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4790921/>
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- Wording changes to bindings and patch desc as per Will Deacon
Changes in v2:
- Add "#ifdef CONFIG_ARM" as per Will Deacon
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 6 ++++++
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
index 37b2caf..e28fced 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
@@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ to deliver its interrupts via SPIs.
- always-on : a boolean property. If present, the timer is powered through an
always-on power domain, therefore it never loses context.
+** Optional properties:
+
+- arm,use-physical-timer : Don't ever use the virtual timer, just use the
+ physical one. Only supported for ARM (not ARM64).
+
+
Example:
timer {
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 5163ec1..e7aa256 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -649,6 +649,11 @@ static void __init arch_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
arch_timer_ppi[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
arch_timer_detect_rate(NULL, np);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "arm,use-physical-timer"))
+ arch_timer_use_virtual = false;
+#endif
+
/*
* If HYP mode is available, we know that the physical timer
* has been configured to be accessible from PL1. Use it, so
--
2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-11 17:00 Doug Anderson [this message]
2014-09-26 10:00 ` [PATCH v3] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify the physical timer Mark Rutland
2014-09-29 17:30 ` Sonny Rao
[not found] ` <CAPz6YkWZWgm--6EJxoV1s3zqTNpAF6+CBOrRc5qxdm5=hFzj1w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-01 15:21 ` Doug Anderson
[not found] ` <1410454801-14231-1-git-send-email-dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-29 13:12 ` Christopher Covington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410454801-14231-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org \
--to=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).