From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] regulator: max77686: Implement suspend disable for some LDOs Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:35:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1414406135.1674.2.camel@AMDC1943> References: <1414403066-7872-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1414403066-7872-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <544E19A4.6040603@collabora.co.uk> <1414405641.1674.1.camel@AMDC1943> <544E1F48.9050105@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <544E1F48.9050105@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Chanwoo Choi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On pon, 2014-10-27 at 11:32 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 10/27/2014 11:27 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > Storing opmode in non-shifted form is intuitive also to me. That's way I > > slipped the bug in previous version. > > > > Great. > > > I'll change this to non-shifted opmode. The patch will grow bigger but > > the code should be more readable. > > > > Maybe split in two patches? A preparatory that adds max77686_get_opmode_shift() > and changes the current driver and a second one that implements suspend disable > for LDOs? Yes, that was the plan :). > > > Thanks! > > You are welcome. > > Best regards, > Javier