From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] regulator: max77686: Store opmode non-shifted Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:45:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1414417537.1674.5.camel@AMDC1943> References: <1414411911-5539-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1414411911-5539-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <544E4A8E.3060803@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <544E4A8E.3060803@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Chanwoo Choi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On pon, 2014-10-27 at 14:37 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 10/27/2014 01:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Introduce simple helper for calculating the shift for OPMODE field in > > registers. This allows storing the current value of opmode in > > non-shifted form and simplifies a little set_suspend_disable and enable > > functions. Additionally this will allow adding support LDOs to the > > existing set_suspend_disable function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Suggested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > --- > > drivers/regulator/max77686.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max77686.c b/drivers/regulator/max77686.c > > The patch looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > > > > static int max77686_set_ramp_delay(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int ramp_delay) > > @@ -495,7 +513,8 @@ static int max77686_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > config.init_data = pdata->regulators[i].initdata; > > config.of_node = pdata->regulators[i].of_node; > > > > - max77686->opmode[i] = regulators[i].enable_mask; > > + max77686->opmode[i] = regulators[i].enable_mask >> > > + max77686_get_opmode_shift(i); > > I don't think it has to be done in your patch but as a follow-up it would be > good to change this to: > > max77686->opmode[i] = MAX77686_NORMAL; > > since that is really what this code is trying to do AFAIU. This just happens > to work because the value of MAX77686_OPMODE_MASK (0x3) is also "Output ON in > Normal Mode" but the code is not correct IMHO. It is technically correct (and regulator core use it this way if enable_val is not specified) but I agree that MAX77686_NORMAL would be more readable. I have some next patches almost ready, so I'll change it there. > Or even better, the regulator mode should be read from the hw registers instead > of setting always to normal. That is what the max77802 driver does for example. This would put trust on the bootloader... I don't know if I could trust him :)