[PATCH] i2c: core: Fix probing of i2c slaves without interrupts

[PATCH] i2c: core: Fix probing of i2c slaves without interrupts

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Since commit 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time"),
i2c slaves without interrupts (e.g. da9210 and at24 on r8a7791/koelsch)
fail to probe:

    at24: probe of 2-0050 failed with error -22

    da9210: probe of 6-0068 failed with error -22

This happens because the call to of_irq_get() in i2c_device_probe()
returns -EINVAL.

If a device node does not have an "interrupts" property,
of_irq_parse_one() fails. Unlike irq_of_parse_and_map(), of_irq_get()
does not ignore errors from of_irq_parse_one(), but forwards them.

Make i2c_device_probe() ignore all errors but -EPROBE_DEFER to fix this,
just like platform_get_irq() and platform_get_irq_byname() already do.

Fixes: 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index a0768d6dffc28aae..cf830915713b387a 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -629,8 +629,10 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
 	if (!client->irq && dev->of_node) {
 		int irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
 
-		if (irq < 0)
+		if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
 			return irq;
+		if (irq < 0)
+			irq = 0;
 
 		client->irq = irq;
 	}
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: Fix probing of i2c slaves without interrupts

[Fabio Estevam]

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Since commit 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time"),
> i2c slaves without interrupts (e.g. da9210 and at24 on r8a7791/koelsch)
> fail to probe:
>
>     at24: probe of 2-0050 failed with error -22
>
>     da9210: probe of 6-0068 failed with error -22
>
> This happens because the call to of_irq_get() in i2c_device_probe()
> returns -EINVAL.
>
> If a device node does not have an "interrupts" property,
> of_irq_parse_one() fails. Unlike irq_of_parse_and_map(), of_irq_get()
> does not ignore errors from of_irq_parse_one(), but forwards them.
>
> Make i2c_device_probe() ignore all errors but -EPROBE_DEFER to fix this,
> just like platform_get_irq() and platform_get_irq_byname() already do.
>
> Fixes: 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>

With this patch applied my codec and PMIC can be probed again:

Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>

Thanks

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: Fix probing of i2c slaves without interrupts

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1310 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 03:08:25PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Since commit 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time"),
> > i2c slaves without interrupts (e.g. da9210 and at24 on r8a7791/koelsch)
> > fail to probe:
> >
> >     at24: probe of 2-0050 failed with error -22
> >
> >     da9210: probe of 6-0068 failed with error -22
> >
> > This happens because the call to of_irq_get() in i2c_device_probe()
> > returns -EINVAL.
> >
> > If a device node does not have an "interrupts" property,
> > of_irq_parse_one() fails. Unlike irq_of_parse_and_map(), of_irq_get()
> > does not ignore errors from of_irq_parse_one(), but forwards them.
> >
> > Make i2c_device_probe() ignore all errors but -EPROBE_DEFER to fix this,
> > just like platform_get_irq() and platform_get_irq_byname() already do.
> >
> > Fixes: 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> 
> With this patch applied my codec and PMIC can be probed again:
> 
> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>

Applied to for-next, thanks!


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: Fix probing of i2c slaves without interrupts

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Geert,

On Monday 17 November 2014 12:43:00 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Since commit 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time"),
> i2c slaves without interrupts (e.g. da9210 and at24 on r8a7791/koelsch)
> fail to probe:
> 
>     at24: probe of 2-0050 failed with error -22
> 
>     da9210: probe of 6-0068 failed with error -22
> 
> This happens because the call to of_irq_get() in i2c_device_probe()
> returns -EINVAL.
> 
> If a device node does not have an "interrupts" property,
> of_irq_parse_one() fails. Unlike irq_of_parse_and_map(), of_irq_get()
> does not ignore errors from of_irq_parse_one(), but forwards them.
> 
> Make i2c_device_probe() ignore all errors but -EPROBE_DEFER to fix this,
> just like platform_get_irq() and platform_get_irq_byname() already do.

Thank you for fixing my mistake.

> Fixes: 2fd36c55264926e2 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>

Just for the record, even if it's too late,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index a0768d6dffc28aae..cf830915713b387a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -629,8 +629,10 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  	if (!client->irq && dev->of_node) {
>  		int irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
> 
> -		if (irq < 0)
> +		if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>  			return irq;
> +		if (irq < 0)
> +			irq = 0;
> 
>  		client->irq = irq;
>  	}

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html