From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philipp Zabel
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] dt-bindings: add document for dw_hdmi
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:19:58 +0100
Message-ID: <1417598398.5124.2.camel@pengutronix.de>
References: <1417505778-18341-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
<1417506124-18626-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
<1417544629.3411.15.camel@pengutronix.de> <547E5F51.2090800@rock-chips.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
In-Reply-To: <547E5F51.2090800@rock-chips.com>
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org
Sender: "devel"
To: Andy Yan
Cc: Mark Rutland , heiko@sntech.de, airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ykk@rock-chips.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Grant Likely , rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com, Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Inki Dae , Rob Herring , Sean Paul , Dave Airlie , mark.yao@rock-chips.com, fabio.estevam@freescale.com, Josh Boyer , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djkurtz@google.com, Kumar Gala , Shawn Guo , vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.comLucas Stach
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Hi Andy,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.12.2014, 08:54 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
> >> +Required properities:
> >> +- compatible: platform specific such as:
> >> + * "fsl,imx6q-hdmi"
> >> + * "fsl,imx6dl-hdmi"
> >> + * "rockchip,rk3288-dw-hdmi"
> > I think we should add a common compatible value "snps,dw-hdmi-tx" here:
> >
> > compatible = "fsl,imx6q-hdmi", "snps,dw-hdmi-tx";
> >
> How about "snps,dw-hdmi", because the driver is not only about
> hdmi tx, but also include hdmi phy.
Synopsys call the whole module
"DesignWare HDMI Transmitter (TX) IP Solution":
https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_14_csds_tx
https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_20_csds_tx
That includes the PHY. I'd prefer keeping the -tx in there to
differentiate from a possible future "snps,dw-hdmi-rx":
https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_14_csds_rx
https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_20_csds_rx
> If we add such compatible value, do we have to implement another
> platform driver like dw_hdmi-pltfm.c with the
> compatible="snps,dw-hdmi" ,
> or just include the compatible value in dw_hdmi-imx.c and
> dw_hdmi-rockchip.c?
That common compatible doesn't have to be used by any driver. It's just
there to show these are the same/similar IP core.
If a common driver without any SoC specific knowledge could be written,
that one would match against the common compatible.
regards
Philipp