From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] dt-bindings: add document for dw_hdmi Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:19:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1417598398.5124.2.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <1417505778-18341-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com> <1417506124-18626-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com> <1417544629.3411.15.camel@pengutronix.de> <547E5F51.2090800@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <547E5F51.2090800@rock-chips.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Andy Yan Cc: Mark Rutland , heiko@sntech.de, airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ykk@rock-chips.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Grant Likely , rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com, Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Inki Dae , Rob Herring , Sean Paul , Dave Airlie , mark.yao@rock-chips.com, fabio.estevam@freescale.com, Josh Boyer , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djkurtz@google.com, Kumar Gala , Shawn Guo , vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.comLucas Stach List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, Am Mittwoch, den 03.12.2014, 08:54 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan: > >> +Required properities: > >> +- compatible: platform specific such as: > >> + * "fsl,imx6q-hdmi" > >> + * "fsl,imx6dl-hdmi" > >> + * "rockchip,rk3288-dw-hdmi" > > I think we should add a common compatible value "snps,dw-hdmi-tx" here: > > > > compatible = "fsl,imx6q-hdmi", "snps,dw-hdmi-tx"; > > > How about "snps,dw-hdmi", because the driver is not only about > hdmi tx, but also include hdmi phy. Synopsys call the whole module "DesignWare HDMI Transmitter (TX) IP Solution": https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_14_csds_tx https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_20_csds_tx That includes the PHY. I'd prefer keeping the -tx in there to differentiate from a possible future "snps,dw-hdmi-rx": https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_14_csds_rx https://www.synopsys.com/dw/ipdir.php?ds=dwc_hdmi_20_csds_rx > If we add such compatible value, do we have to implement another > platform driver like dw_hdmi-pltfm.c with the > compatible="snps,dw-hdmi" , > or just include the compatible value in dw_hdmi-imx.c and > dw_hdmi-rockchip.c? That common compatible doesn't have to be used by any driver. It's just there to show these are the same/similar IP core. If a common driver without any SoC specific knowledge could be written, that one would match against the common compatible. regards Philipp